THE KENNEDY FAMILY; THE MAFIA; THE COMMUNIST; AND THE NEW SOCIALISM; A RETROSPECTIVE OUTLOOK; AMERICA AND NATIONALISM; JAN 24, 2010

To clear up the record, McCarthyism and the Kennedy family is misunderstood. This is an enemy who is underground. They have advantage similar to the mob, hit men, and guerrilla warfare. When McCarthyism hit the scene; not even McCarthy could describe it or teach it. Like the Salem Witch trials or the Inquisition; Catholicism engages in dogma and demonic puppet shows occasionally; but when asked to explain or write it down; they hallucinate. McCarthy was a media stunt and an effort to grandstand; if not it scared the hell out of thinking people when minds went blank. You can never change who you are but enemies will pressure you to say insane things which make no sense. A good leader is a perfect match; these are leaders who lack important characteristics which make them easy to destroy; such as a big mouth and deadly narcissism. Why did McCarthyism only occur in the United States and can only be described as hysteria? Other nations had much more problems with communism. Liberals had history backwards during the cold war which made America vulnerable.

Kennedy took had taken the mantle from one of the greatest Generals in US history. Immediately, he canceled the escalation in Vietnam against the wishes of the CIA and Pentagon. With severe criticism, he reversed this and changed his tune even if he won the debate with the Bay of Pigs fiasco. The mafia in Florida and the Cubans were trying to overthrow Castro; we know for sure the Jewish Mafia in Miami and New Orleans was behind this. The mafia and the fascist are synonymously to the communist movement but have tremendous pressure to reform and change. Take away this pressure and you will have a communist. Guerrillas do not fight by the rules and use advantage to bleed their foes; they are a patient and persistent enemy; master tacticians. Criminal elements lack this stardom and strategic precision. Nobody wanted this element of human useless elitism; nobody sought their approval or help; but they wish to treat us and medicate us; a process of becoming support instead of warfare.

Kennedy, in failing to impress the Pentagon and win over the Irish-Scottish pride, creates missteps and collective bargaining which is destructive to the outcomes. He is forced to escalate in Vietnam by sending in the advisers and MACV forces in the early 1960s; then he makes a major strategic and tactical mistake. By waging war on the mafia; he overstepped his capabilities. As a guerrilla group, they operate with advantages. Kennedy neither knew any of this nor had any clue who and what they were. So he walked into their traps and like the Bay of Pigs fiasco, he paid dearly for this dogma and always changing his tune. Like guerrilla war, if you act in a premeditated manner, the enemy will change and camouflage. You do not move on guerrilla forces until you understand them and have the advantage; the same mistake in Vietnam. What advantage or upper hand do you have to act in this manner or move your forces to that leverage point?

When Kennedy moved on the mafia; they moved on him faster. They are skilled gunfighters; these people are fools; Murder Incorporated is a guerrilla army. Murder Incorporated will overthrow the US government by keeping law enforcement guessing and terrorized. So Kennedy in his attempt to constantly collective bargain made very poor decisions and was always forced to change his positions; all liberals operate on this molasses like mindset. He moved on the two extremes of the right and left wing; they are no different than the communist and are underground; guerrillas. Even the US military is incapable of understanding guerrilla forces and well funded and armed ones. Guerrillas are radicals; regular troops are not.

The left wing and the communist did correct his mistakes in Vietnam by allowing LBJ to escalate it and distort the cold war as the liberals had so often done. Although, not as malignant as the collective bargaining with the Pentagon; LBJ gave it his best and could not match the communist or their advantage as a liberal, left wing, and Democrat. It is clear, he and they did not understand the enemy or who this enemy was; their own worst enemy. The mafia usually kills Jewish businesses and Murder Incorporated; however, during the cold war, liberals had history backwards; they were the bosses. To say the mafia and communism are one and the same, radical immigrants or traitors; is what the Kennedy family had tried to say.

So why Teddy Kennedy was so aligned to the communist and will later be the spearhead of it? The family suffered much tribulation in politics, never quite getting good enough footholds on what the problem was. Therefore, after decades of collective bargaining; the pressure to reform and become anti-communist cause severe disgruntled feelings in the dream and the hopes of the poor. Their wish is full inclusion and to be viewed as patriots. However, the battles and thick skin over the years pushed them underground and thus; to the advantage of the guerrillas and mafia. They all ended up the same, in an undesirable position and unable to win; so if you cannot beat them, join them. Will they ever be able to beat me; traitor or not? Never in a million years, never; ask them if there is a perfect record. The entire Kennedy and Democratic push in the 1960s harnessed the power of the Irish unions, Jewish lawyers, and the black movement; this was also their downfall. We however, do not call it guilt by association; we call it liberalism or guilt by association.

The Democratic Party and Ted Kennedy were taken apart piece by piece until it led to socialism. Had the pressures not been there, he would have warmly embraced communism; however, he hated the mafia and was an overt competitor. In the end, it was family name which mattered most. Politics is a deadly game and if you cannot change who you are; then others will strip away your camouflage. In the end, they accepted him and he accepted them; however, he was not brainwashed but instead did not resist or rebel. The reality of the world broke them down, forced them to subjugate, and all the pieces aligned for the left wing, liberals, and labor movement; socialism. To have socialism, you must have fascist. Keep in mind, blacklisting is a union issue; internal and external. It was adopted as a tool to fight the left wing and liberals. These are the same people who cause you to be angry the entire day when they talk to you; they must be eradicated or kept at a distance.

To breed fascism, you must need criminals and a large enough challenge to infest political initiatives with strategic initiatives. When the state is weakened and nothing works; only crime works. Who in their right mind will ever resist fascism when it is the only lifeline to save the state and control the criminals? So are they traitors? 100 per cent yes. Do they have any other choice? No. They cannot change who they are; only who others; what is the pressure? The pressure is Limbaugh, Massachusetts, health care, debt, Haiti, and weak on crime. Education is one of their advantages; the rest is participation and voting rights. So democracy favors those who are most informed; not the least. America is in a state of denial because this does not happen or ever happens in a Christian nation where crime and debt are persistent and recidivist. The Christian religion failed to reform its own message; thus compassion. Again, repulsive humans wishing to save our souls and treat our hatred of them without some superior lack of reality. This weak on crime disease has led to world warfare.

The dynamics of Vietnam during a revolutionary time did not afford the United States any other option. Vietnam happened for a reason and one not yet clearly understood because the outcome was tremendous. Escalation in Vietnam was inevitable if combating communism was the goal of the cold war. Similarly, the domino theory applied not to one region; there were almost 20 overthrows during the early periods. So did Eisenhower forecast the events in the 1950s? No. Did Kennedy or Lyndon Johnson forecast the events in the 1960s? No. Did Nixon or Kissinger forecast the events in the 1980s? If they did, then they were helpless. So did anybody forecast the events from 1990 to 2010? What are we reading right now? Whatever Vietnam was about, it is back now. What exactly is happening now?