YES WE KANT!

The Bill of Rights or the first ten amendments to the Constitution is the most credible and most sacred document which proclaims the right of the individual to exist and why that right is precious and sacred; it is from the heavens. However, within that right to exist is the collision and the collaboration between heaven and hell which is a daily struggle to preserve that right to exist as an individual and for those whose talents which supersede and whose value outmatch human standards; why let go. Why does a person have a right to survive or not be bullied into letting go of their right to live or survive as a human being? Does politics or the political process, the nation’s business, supersede that right and the heavens? Lastly, what happens when the gift of the heaven is threatened and ignored in a complicit and threatening manner, to violate the precious and to abuse the right to exist themselves? How far can you violate that right to exist before it ends quickly, swiftly, and without remorse or regret?

The man gave himself up at midmorning west of downtown Santa Barbara at Highway 101, a major route along the California coast. No shots were fired. Traffic was backed at least three miles in each direction…Police identified the man as 28-year-old Eddie Van Tassel. Pfleging said the man is believed to be a service veteran and will receive a mental health evaluation…The man, wearing a ski mask and brown fatigues, had the flag in one hand and the gun in the other when officers arrived …A police special weapons and tactics team and a crisis negotiation team used a bullhorn to communicate with him. After nearly three hours, he put the handgun on the ground and walked backward to police officers. As for the man's motive, Duarte said, "The reason appears to be anti-war, but I don't know the specifics." Santa Barbara is 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles. – Flag-waving Gunman Closes California Highway for Hours, by Erica Werner, Associated Press, November 03, 2008 -

We and everybody knows that at the magic of the chagrin of liberals and so called conservatives; the idea is how the “people’s business” or the “nation’s business” is a self declaration they did the “right thing.” Notwithstanding, even some conservatives claim they did the right thing while they stick a finger in the eye of those who see them in plain view and with twenty-twenty vision. However, liberals have a magic about them which they keep secret; they self judge themselves and feel it is truth when it might be insanity. That voice they hear might be the devil talk. So before anybody says they did the right thing or did the nation’s business, lest they befall to the criticisms of those who wait to know exactly what they did to say it was the right thing. The legal game is the same, before you declare others guilty, ask if you are also. That is the game this devil plays with us and we have seen them play this game first hand.

If you are interested and intent on going after those who are behind the worst financial crisis and threat in the history of the black movement; please let us know. Your comrades are both committed and dependent on your response. Get those “capitalist pigs” as Marxists like to say it and take back their tax dollar profits finally and when your comrades are ready to crush them, they are dependent on your response. Our side is sharpening their knives much too quickly. Let us know if you are hot and bothered also about the right of the individual before it is used on you, your comrades await. – Letter to the 44th President of the United States of America, November 08, 2008 -

There is something very wrong. If you go and ask all military positions from helicopter pilots, Apache pilots, infantry soldiers, to medical personnel; how do they rank their jobs, most will score over 8. If you ask us what our job satisfaction level is it ranks less than zero and this is why. It is like dealing with Hitler on a day to day basis and Hitler is in no mood to cooperate or follow orders. If you are lucky enough to escape the third Reich and make it to safety, they let you work and have a bank account to have some value to your name before their police force mugs you. In some other world and chapter a discussion was presented on the liberals, left wing, and the Democratic Party to place the right of the individual to not exist while they use those same arguments to cancel out weaker, principled, religious, or any other forces. Why do the left wing and liberals use democracy to burn down their own neighborhood and shut others up while they tax based on some poverty stricken mindset or a necessity for change and more of this insanity?

Taliban fighters held a wedding party captive and fired on U.S. forces in an attack designed to draw U.S. air strikes on civilians and stoke anti-American sentiment, a U.S. official said Friday citing “firsthand” reports…But such a tactic by the Taliban could mean significant complications for U.S. forces and allies — forcing them to break off attacks and pursuit of extremists in populated areas for fear that the Taliban would try to maximum civilian casualties…But the U.S. claim Friday represents the first detailed intelligence on an apparent Taliban strategy to bring innocent lives into the crossfire, the official told The Associated Press. “We have firsthand knowledge that we know this was a deliberate act on the part of the Taliban to draw our forces into a fight and to cause civilian casualties, knowing that a wedding party was going on,” the official said. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the U.S. findings. The official, however, did not offer additional evidence — leaving the United States open to accusations that it was trying shift blame for civilian deaths onto Taliban tactics and away from possible American battlefield mistakes… - US Official: Taliban Sought Wedding Party Deaths, by Jason Straziuso, (post on website Sweetness&Light, November 08, 2008 -

Part of the explanation here is why they would shut up or prevent the truth about them. When other human beings figure out, expose, investigate, or find out who they are; they become homicidal and hate them more than the devil. The devil is only an icon of the evil, the bad, and the ugliness of this world; this is for real. They are not shooting blanks or playing around; they want the blood of their victims and their prisoners. They will resort to terrorism and communism in order to burn down their neighborhood and tax even more powerfully. This hatred and homicidal flurry for liberals, the left wing, and what we know to be so debilitating it is life threatening; is the basis of a right to exist and a right to exist as an individual.

In New York, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein has ordered the release of eight more grand jury transcripts from the famous 1951 spy case that led to the conviction of the husband and wife pro-Soviet spy team of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Reuters reports this story as if there is some cloud of doubt still hanging over the Rosenberg's conviction despite that their guilt is no longer debatable. Yet here is Reuters giving cover to those who stubbornly wish to cast doubt on the U.S. prosecution of the Rosenbergs. It also gives Reuters and U.S. detractors the opportunity once again smears America by raising their favorite Cold War boogie man, Joe McCarthy. …It is amazing to see Reuters use every U.S. bash they could in one little paragraph. The Rosenbergs were victims of a "frame-up" because of "McCarthyism hysteria and Cold War fear." Notice how Reuters seems to forget to mention that there is no longer any doubt that the Rosenbergs were guilty, though? - Reuters Cover Up: Bashing the U.S. and Ignoring Proof that Famous Spies were Guilty, by Warner Todd Huston, August 27, 2008 -

Keep in mind, the only reason to tax is to burn down your own neighborhood. The only way for socialism is to forward a necessity which supersedes this other necessity for a free market or a thriving capitalistic economy. Socialism is an open door for communism but it is also a door that has been shut with the collapse of communism. Therefore, the left wing is attenuating between irregular spouts of insanity, part time thievery, part time common sense, part time practicality, and mostly sympathy for their angry resentful need to burn down their own neighborhoods and what little they have. That is just the way they are and live their life as worthless, gutless, and useless. Do not expect much from them but lies and a general disappointment and do not marry one unless you truly believe in them.

Do not put this nation through another grueling eight year struggle with these capitalistic pigs who draw out their fight for so long while we figure out what in hell they are talking about. Your fights are a quick one and in quick fights, make sure you have the biggest guns and air support. Do not pick a fight. Do not draw your fight out like these capitalistic pigs that have wrecked the economy and jeopardized all minorities for their stupidity and usury. They were hoping you would excuse and reward the worst financial circus to afflict the black movement in 45 years. They will use you and your voice while you suffer, are their prisoner, and do not have a right to exist as a human being. – Letter to the 44th President of the United States of America, November 08, 2008 -

Their world view is so dangerous they do not understand it. It is so debilitating it can inflict homicidal reaction to this pursuit and mugging. They are so deranged and sadistic; they cannot even help themselves about it. Therefore, we turn to the father of insanity and the God of philosophy to explain why they lack the right to exist if not avoidable and if they were and are trying to say all human beings on earth do not have a right to exist. We turn to the man who started this and the one who in one stroke of the pen declared all human beings worthless, gutless, useless, insane, and edging on homicidal revolution; Emmanuel Kant.

Suspected militants have killed men accused of spying for the United States in Pakistan’s tribal region of North Waziristan, local tribesmen said Saturday. Two bullet-ridden bodies of Afghan nationals were found at Dargah Mandai area near the border area in North Waziristan on Saturday, they said. A note in the native Pashto language found near the body of the slain men, said that they were spying for the United States and Afghan government. The note warned that anyone spying for the U.S. or Afghanistan would face the same situation. Militants are blamed for attacking people suspected of spying for the U.S. or Pakistani authorities in the region, which borders Afghanistan, and where al Qaeda- and Taliban-linked militants operate… - Terrorist Kill Two US ‘Spies’ in Pakistan, by Iran’s Islamic Republic News Agency (posted on website Sweetness&Light), November 08, 2008 -

A quick biography and some warnings about Emmanuel Kant; his works on reason, pure reason, practicality, metaphysical, and epistemology has influence just about all thinking human beings since he introduced it in the late 1700s and early 1800s. the Copernican Revolution, that of reason and substance, is credited to his works which in one stroke of the pen declared all other works insane, incompatible, insufficient, unexplainable, evolving mysterious, and a presupposed in determinability until, by time and space, some paradigm in thought can wash away the mystery and the flaws. His works can take a lifetime to understand and his words are near poetic science. The process of simplification is so compacted and derivative of reality, it is difficult to transcend the conceptual knowledge less the understanding he called pure reason.

On the contrary, Fyodor Dostoevsky was another great thinker who either did or tiredly tried to outlast Emmanuel Kant in his understanding of substance. Neither of them is a quick read or a quick guide to life but a gilded build up of some ultimate possession to unlock the mystery of life itself; the right to live and the right to destroy those living. This knowledge will eventually be misused and presupposed to warfare which place necessity and practicality as a means to declare the right of the individual to exist insanity itself. That is how insane this world and human beings are; they either understand or can explain why or what they are doing, or not. What they can explain is the common sense, the practicality, and the necessity to do it; that which Kant describes as statistics, political system, insufficient science, bias or influence, individualism, ideology of greed, flaws of achievement, dogma of pure reason, hate for mankind, exaggerated expectations, flawed disappointment, deontology or duty; finally, good will and God will, that of self and others.

Is it not to laugh? The increased threats against Mr. Obama — due to (you guessed it) the rabble rousing Sarah Palin. Is there nothing she is not guilty of? Is she not solely responsible for global warming and most forms of cancer? Mind you, the article somehow neglects to mention that Governor Palin was completely exonerated for her alleged crimes in Troopergate at literally the eleventh hour before the election. And exactly who would be offended by Sarah Palin sailing into a room wearing nothing but a towel? Are we all homosexuals now? Or is it just that they are now the majority in political campaigns and news rooms? But isn’t this all too familiar? Haven’t we seen very similar stories come out in the press whenever John McCain has lost in the past? No wonder he is a darling of the media — and will soon be again. He’s so honorable, you know. And, alas, it isn’t just Newsweek. See the comments below for BillK’s posts of some of the now ubiquitous media attacks on Sarah Palin. The word has obviously gone out. We can’t have a charismatic conservative left standing. She must be destroyed. - Ann Coulter on Sarah Palin Effigies and Media Lynching, posted on getdrunkandvote4mccain.com website, November 06, 2008 -

Thomas Hobbes described human beings as no damn good and this prompted the creation of a monster called Leviathan to secure a contract to life and to uphold property. It is the basis of English common law and even the criminal justice system which places murder as the most vile and inhuman act on any other human being. However, no thinker alive, not even Thomas Hobbes, has been able to match Kant in detail and understanding levels, thus his works went on to influence his best students Hegel, Nietzsche, and a few others. The counter movement to reverse what Kant achieve in one pen stroke was immense and a global response. It then leads to the British and the French to derive revolutionary ideals and principles which were demonical portions of the all encompassing and all omnipotent formula of Kant. As immense as his work is, he himself tries to find the balance of his works, what he called pure reason and practicality; which is also another school of British thought called utilitarianism.

"Ha, ha, ha! You will be finding enjoyment in toothache next," you cry, with a laugh. "Well, even in toothache there is enjoyment," I answer. I had toothache for a whole month and I know there is. In that case, of course, people are not spiteful in silence, but moan; but they are not candid moans, they are malignant moans, and the malignancy is the whole point. The enjoyment of the sufferer finds expression in those moans; if he did not feel enjoyment in them he would not moan. It is a good example, gentlemen, and I will develop it. Those moans express in the first place all the aimlessness of your pain, which is so humiliating to your consciousness; the whole legal system of nature on which you spit disdainfully, of course, but from which you suffer all the same while she does not. They express the consciousness that you have no enemy to punish, but that you have pain; the consciousness that in spite of all possible Wagenheims you are in complete slavery to your teeth; that if someone wishes it, your teeth will leave off aching, and if he does not, they will go on aching another three months; and that finally if you are still contumacious and still protest, all that is left you for your own gratification is to thrash yourself or beat your wall with your fist as hard as you can, and absolutely nothing more. - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky -

Keep in mind that up until these periods, philosophy was a form of heresy and a challenge to the church; this was more of a science and an understanding of why humans are insane and act upon this insanity. Classical works such as Candide, The Crucible, Madame Bovary, and other masterpieces so challenged free thought it was a crime. The goal of this chapter is to root out why the liberals and the left wing burn down their own neighborhoods destroy their own neighbors, and threaten the world to a near homicidal level with their insanity and lunatic necessity. The problem as identified in the previous chapter is how certain human beings do not feel other human beings have the right to exist as an individual whether they are poor, rich, or nothing. A near serial killer, psychopathic, and felonious thug like way to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Just remember, you may not agree with me, but respect my advice. They do not respect your right to exist as a human being. Steer clear of Clinton and eastern liberals linked to Bush. They will move at night and under the cloak of darkness comrade. You are in no poise to make enemies at this time. It took us eight long years, four to figure out it was also Clinton, to figure out what they were up to, do not waste the four you will have or you will regret betraying the black movement and your own people who are dependent on you. Two big topics will be in your face immediately, national security and taxes; these capitalistic pigs want the same thing you want but only one can be honest about it. What you have now is what they want. Me, I don’t give a god damn care or to play a game of betrayal. Your fight will be quick so you must count on us. – Letter to the 44th President of the United States of America, November 09, 2008 -

Those voices in their heads need to be quieted or need to be exposed by the experiences of this world. This is no joke, any human being who is better or of more worth odiously does not have the right to exist as an individual so long as they can pick, prey on, stalk, target, kidnap, or others. These people make people so disgusted with human life and the human experience even if they stand there with a blank and stupid look of disgust themselves as they burn down their own nation, neighborhood, and life. That fire spreads fast and can consume the life of others. People are so disgusted the stock market can plummet 900 points in one day at the mere inactions or a lie by a political jackass.

The claim was bogus, but on MSNBC, instead of citing the Todd case as further proof of the maxim "Never believe claims of racial bias until proved," the hoax hate crime led to somber discussions of -- you guessed it! -- racism in America. MSNBC's Keith Olbermann histrionically described Todd's hoax as "a narrative straight out of Reconstruction-era, race-based fear-mongering…said the Pittsburgh hoax was "the blood libel against black men concerning the defilement of the flower of Caucasian womanhood. It's been with us for hundreds of years and, apparently, is still with us." …on the subject of race crimes in his famous April 25, 2006, Post column melodramatically saying of the Duke Lacrosse rape case: "It's impossible to avoid thinking of all the black women who were violated by drunken white men in the American South over the centuries. The master-slave relationship, the tradition of droit du seigneur, the use of sexual possession as an instrument of domination -- all this ugliness floods the mind, unbidden, and refuses to leave." …Meanwhile, back at Hoax Interpretation Central, Olbermann spent most of October issuing blistering denunciations of … someone had yelled "Kill him!" in reference to …Olbermann lectured. "If … have not previously crossed it this week, today even, they most certainly did." …After beating the "Kill him!" story to death for a week, Olbermann delivered one of his comical "Special Comments" about the incident. "You, Sen. McCain," he pompously announced, "are not only a fraud, sir, but you are tacitly inciting lunatics to violence." Olbermann demanded that McCain cease campaigning: "Suspend your campaign now until you or somebody else gets some control over it. And it ceases to be a clear and present danger to the peace of this nation." - Read Hoax Blue Hoax, by Ann Coulter, October 29, 2008 -

This problem is so immense, it has been able to make others agree to it and even act on their every demand. They are so immense, they can go before the public and lie inconspicuously in front of all media channels and not a single form of punishment will be met. They can even ride the lies and the deceit of the public to the offices of power and most especially the office of the leader of the free world. That is a terrifying thought and it is a thought we tripped over and had to experience first hand in the last ten years fighting this lunatic monster we call the government. Right now, the government is behaving so erratically; people are frozen. The stock market itself is being decimated and the fabricated values of the welfare state are coming to a crashing debt spending. People know this cannot continue and while the liberals, the left wing, and the Democrats spew off lies and necessity excuses, the stock markets crash and burn into a hole of amorous socialism. Does that slice the throat of the conations or the throats of the insane posse of liars or thieves?

Peace and security will never be delivered or arrive when you burn down your own neighbors and your nation. The “People’s Business” will never be pardoned or paroled by homicidal hordes of conspirators and shady mafia figures. Democracy will never work so long as the right of the individual to exist is trampled on and raped daily in an incoherent and incompatible way of life. If these human beings are continuously convinced of the reward for burning their own neighborhoods down or their own country, then they will for that reward and that power to punish, dominate, and pronounce all life on earth is threatened and in dangerous peril by liberals, the elite left wing, and a few worthless and stupid gutless imbeciles with a few guns and bombs.

"Ha, ha, ha! You will be finding enjoyment in toothache next," you cry, with a laugh. "Well, even in toothache there is enjoyment," I answer. I had toothache for a whole month and I know there is. In that case, of course, people are not spiteful in silence, but moan; but they are not candid moans, they are malignant moans, and the malignancy is the whole point. The enjoyment of the sufferer finds expression in those moans; if he did not feel enjoyment in them he would not moan. It is a good example, gentlemen, and I will develop it. Those moans express in the first place all the aimlessness of your pain, which is so humiliating to your consciousness; the whole legal system of nature on which you spit disdainfully, of course, but from which you suffer all the same while she does not. They express the consciousness that you have no enemy to punish, but that you have pain; the consciousness that in spite of all possible Wagenheims you are in complete slavery to your teeth; that if someone wishes it, your teeth will leave off aching, and if he does not, they will go on aching another three months; and that finally if you are still contumacious and still protest, all that is left you for your own gratification is to thrash yourself or beat your wall with your fist as hard as you can, and absolutely nothing more. - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky -

With the election of 2008 going to the Democrats and the domination of the Congress in the hands of the left wing; the reason and practicality of a stock market and financial disaster is very real. It is real because it is a deception and a way to burn the nation down, attack the existence of human life, declare it the people’s will or business, and base a means to tax or spend on necessity. In the end, this art in motion and the artificial economy of its byproduct will collapse or correct to some real value which brings them closer to the reality. It takes disaster to make this dirt stupid animal step down, capitulate, cooperate, tell the truth, and even change. What we are seeing is the largest challenge imaginable and the biggest conflagration of forces by two enemy forces that have been defeated in two World Wars and several skirmished in the past.

Roughly 80 percent of former Weathermen are full college professors -- 99 percent if you don't include the ones killed in shoot-outs with the police or in prison -- i.e., not yet pardoned by a Democratic president. …While others were hard at work on Ph.D.s, Susan Rosenberg was conspiring to kill cops and blow up buildings, and was assembling massive caches of explosives. This put her on the fast track for a teaching position at Hamilton College! …Hamilton within a few years of President Clinton pardoning her in 2001, releasing her from a 58-year prison sentence for participating in the murder of cops and possessing more than 700 pounds of explosives. …Hundreds of college professors have signed a letter vouching for Ayers, which would be like Lester Maddox producing a letter from George Wallace assuring us that Maddox is a respected member of the community. …Great Republican though he was, Walter Annenberg died in 2002. The money came from the Annenberg Foundation, which, like all foundations, distributes money to projects that its founder would despise. John Kerry ran for president on the late John Heinz's money. That didn't mean Republican Heinz was endorsing Kerry. …Left-wing radicals swarm to free foundation money, where they can give gigantic grants to one another and they will never have to do a day's work. That's exactly what Obama and Ayers did with Annenberg's money. …Forget about Ayers' domestic terrorism when Obama "was 8 years old." Does he agree with Ayers' idiot ideas right now? - Ayers: Radical Loon When Obama was Only 47, by Ann Coulter, October 22, 2008 -

The reality is people are disgusted and homicidal about them and them burning down their own neighborhoods, what little they have. What little they have in material and mental thought has been the basis of many wars and many reasons why life ends. No thinking person on earth has the fight of this dirt stupid animal, yet they wish to dominate and dominate the lives of those more valuable and more intelligent. They view all human beings as their prisoner and they feel that the right of the individual ceases to exist based on their impulsive and lying ways. They feel fiscal and tax policies are based on necessity regardless of who is burning down their neighborhood; God, man, beast, mysteries, or their own lies. Government is not there to be their best friend or keep them alive. It is there to make sure we are enthusiastic, thriving, happy, and alive; and they are gone. Where did this go way wrong?

If you listen to the Clintons, you will loose. If you do not, then you will loose. Until the Republicans can clean out all of their spies who infested our side, we are in a difficult position also. They are huge and they do not play by the rules. You know the odds here and why you will need my odds. I believe in the right of the individual and the right of individual talent. They are worse than Hitler and will make your job satisfaction, like mine and Ann, less than zero. Just remember, these liberals are all the same. They go in a fight and have no clue when they are going to get an ass whooping. So if it takes an ass whooping, then that is what they get royale. If it takes a little more than an ass whooping, then it does. If they go looking for an ass whooping, then surely they will get an ass whooping. Ass whooping aside, hope and change is coming. Stay away from eastern liberals if you know what is good for you; they will not concede power to you regardless of what you say and don't do. If you silence the conservative voice, your ass whooping will be everlasting; ask Bush, Rush, Sean, Clinton, and a few others. I suggest you do not even try to pull off another beggar’s ball. Security and national security first; all the change and the next 200 years is in a book soon to be out and a lot of people know what is going on and who is destroying this nation. If you kill national security, you will never ever have a country again. . – Letter to the 44th President of the United States of America, November 11, 2008 -

Their determination to avoid and exclude substantive thought defies super human abilities and convictions. There is no basis to even call them human or a necessity to call them citizens. The only injection of necessity they formulate politics and control of and by is the unity of existing conditions and the taxonomy of a practical understanding that life will be worse off if they are allowed to perish. The problem is not their right to exist; their problem is their politics, control, and future or past events. Therefore, the insanity is how they burn their neighborhoods and turn around and make some pity drenched excuse about how it is a right to tax those more valuable, smarter, or principled; they feel better human beings have an obligation to them as a powerful group who dominates others and make their bones tremble in some homicidal self defense. This stupidity is so debilitating and dangerous; it can lead to sudden death and instantaneous civil war if they were honest.

They are so dangerous they lie. They are so stupid they lie. They are so evil they lie. They are so useless they lie. They are so dependent they lie. They are so ignorant they lie. They are so criminal they lie. They are so insane and barbaric they lie. When you lie well enough and long enough, other people believe it. So they lie even more. Now they are not liars but heroes. They have appalling piety. They dangerously hide while dangerously trying to scam others into another lie. Their lies now can fluctuate between irregular forms of insanity and necessity. The heroes now, when laid to enough, become victims. More excuses burning down the neighborhood and taxing this common sense and practicality of stupidity and insanity.

And why should Republican activists slave away …viciously attacked… in The Washington Post during the Republican primaries, "John McCain is feared by Democrats and liked by independents." Dionne proclaimed that McCain "may be the one Republican who can rescue his party from the undertow of the Bush years." Similarly, after unelectable, ultraconservative Reagan won two landslide victories, James Reston of The New York Times gave the same advice to Vice President George H.W. Bush: Stop being conservative! Bush was "a good man," Reston said in 1988, "and might run a strong campaign if liberated from Mr. Reagan's coattails." Roll that phrase around a bit -- "liberated from Mr. Reagan's coattails." This is why it takes so long to read the Times -- you have to keep reading the same paragraph over again to see if you missed a word. Bush, of course, rode Reagan's ultraconservative coattails to victory, then snipped those coattails by raising taxes and was soundly defeated four years later. I keep trying to get Democrats to take my advice (stop being so crazy), but they never listen to me. Why do Republicans take the advice of their enemies? How many times do we have to run this experiment… I am now liberated to announce that all I care about is hunting down and punishing every Republican who voted for McCain in the primaries. I have a list and am prepared to produce the names of every person who told me he was voting for McCain to the proper authorities. …For now, we have a new president-elect. In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president. Starting tomorrow, if not sooner. - The Reign of Lame Falls Mainly on McCain, by Ann Coulter, November 05, 2008 -

Usually people do not act on stupidity or insanity but this liar does. Not only that, they can stand before a crowd with utmost confidence and unshakeable sick demented evil and not feel an ounce of regret. Excuse us, we are not insane. Excuse us; we are prisoners and not the individuals wanted dead or alive. Burn down their neighborhood because others hate them and are disgusted and when they are done, jump off a bridge so no more debt is a necessity. We can end this kidnapping and ten years of terror right now. People are going to turn homicidal on them when and if they are prosecuted. This useless and worthless enemy does not act on stupidity and insanity; they go to war with it as their God.

We cannot take this principle as stated at face value, if we want to come up with a consistent reading of the Underground Man's beliefs. If the Underground Man actually believed that "the world can go to hell, so long as I can always have my tea," he would, after all, really be Chernyshevsky's egoistic man, always directed by the motive of vygoda, "advantage," "comfort" or "pleasure." It is clear that Dostoevsky's polemic toward the end of Part I is directed against Chernyshevsky's view, so we would have to take this declaration of utilitarian egoism as a case of the narrator "lying," something he admits to having done frequently, "out of spite" (4),5 or as what Mikhail Bakhtin calls the "loophole" that allows the Underground Man to contradict himself, turning his monologue into dialogue (Bakhtin 233).6 The narrator is taking up Chernyshevsky's position, here, for the purpose of beating it down elsewhere. This fact does not yet entail an acceptance of Kantian ethics, but we can certainly see that Kant and Dostoevsky have a common enemy in utilitarianism. …The Underground Man is also motivated by an aesthetic principle. If morality were the only motivation for action, after all, we would not need to worry about it. The masochistic idea that the Underground Man would break out of Chernyshevsky's "crystal palace" merely for the sake of doing so, is highly consistent with Kant's aesthetic notion that the feeling of the sublime is produced by violating the boundaries of the elegant and the useful, and that the pleasure of the sublime is one wholly unto itself, serving no other function. - “Kant’s Aesthetics in Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground” by David Goldfarb, Newsletter of the Society for Russian Religious Philosophy, Spring 1995, pg. 11-19, Columbia University -

So why do they have a right to exist and we do not? Who has a right to exist and why? In one stroke of the pen, Emmanuel Kant answered this mystery relationship between human and God which Kant said presupposes the mystery? First it is duty; Kant says human beings have a deontology or duty. Second, Kant says that all human beings, thinking or not, are insane. Do not take this to extremism or dogma to say that humans are no damn good and need to die immediately. There is a philosophical and economic need to adjust to the people who we are dealing with and if bombs and jets are needed, then let us not hesitate by their lies and deception. They are the walking dead, not us.

Many of them will tell you no no no, Obama can be more of a centrist, oh the socialist stuff... I think there is no evidence in the record for that; but if they are right it's going to be Democrats. The thin sparse record that exists; his friends, his associates, how he voted in the Illinois legislature, how he voted in the United States Senate... now that they have a Democrat House and Senate, they are going to push him to do crazy things even he may not want to do... so historically they get it in right away and all the really horrible things they are going to do... screaming bloody murder about Obama, I think it would be kind of embarrassing for him at this point. ...But I think a certain cable station that has done nothing but attack the Bush Administration for the past eight years may see a decline in viewers, I mean what is MSNBC going to do attack Bill O'Reilly 24 hours a day? - Ann Coulter on Your World with Neil Cavuto, November 05, 2008 on election results and new President -

There is a philosophical and economic necessity to escape the drowning reality of them bleeding on us and this artificial prison they lie majestically and utopian about to keep all human beings locked, caged, and obligated. If nobody wants them and they cause others to become disgusted and homicidal, how can anybody threaten them? The only thing at this time which threatens them is whether or not they can lie blatantly now or continue this charade of a political circus to tax this world as they burn down their own neighbors and neighborhood with majestic stupidity and the splendor of taxing insanity; they call it a necessity and a war on poverty. Is that free speech or speech to make others oppressed and obligated? Is that speech which others willingly want to kill as the devil? Why are these people so insane they must resort to kidnapping us and torturing us for a full decade to avoid prosecution? If they feel their existence is threatened, then free speech never injured them before; why is free speech so injurious now to our existence or theirs?

Dealing with your terrorists and stalkers has left me with a severe suspicion and an almost ugly impression that you may not care for the angry retaliation these traitors inflict on others in order to make you stop. That is the objective of terrorism, to humiliate others and make them stop some real or imaginary attack. They want you to feel guilty or make you feel you will burn in hell. Whether you are or not is up to you. It has to do with free speech and penmanship. It is a way to shut you up and to cover over their violence to shut others up, intimidate them and scare them. I myself disagree with several things you did such the case with politico.com and 40 accounts being shut down there, which was then used as ammunition against me and this battle with your stalkers. They were in control of the site and wanted me gone. I am not sure if you feel guilty or not. I am not sure if you use me to get rid of that guilt but if you are, then you are just as guilty as this dirt worthless and useless pieces of feces I keep stepping on and who will not get out of my own life; and yours. I am some type of justification for them and some guilt trip for you which they can use to harp at everybody to stop. They are terrorists and communists; do you think they feel any guilt? They are not even human beings any longer. The left wing and the liberals feel you are a traitor to their race and cause.

We have other words for it but they too feel that it does not meet their standards and is hateful because it prevents the important matters from surfacing or becoming an unborn future. Socialism and communism is not hate speech but their insanity is? What is the real necessity here? Is it the right to exist as a human being or is it the end of this right to exist as a better or more valuable human being? Why that does not only hate speech but residual and recidivistic treason? That is majestic lies from a serial killer, a sadistic devil, and some invading army of terrorists behind enemy lines. Why is being better or more valuable a crime? Why is killing the devil a crime? Why is the speech of the devil appropriate but the voice of God not? Do god and his wrath hate speech also? Where in hell is this insanity coming from is not of this earth? We need to not only find it but we need to burn to hell what it hides underneath.

In the "Palace of Crystal" it is unthinkable; suffering means doubt, negation, and what would be the good of a "palace of crystal" if there could be any doubt about it? And yet I think man will never renounce real suffering, that is, destruction and chaos. Why, suffering is the sole origin of consciousness. Though I did lay it down at the beginning that consciousness is the greatest misfortune for man, yet I know man prizes it and would not give it up for any satisfaction. Consciousness, for instance, is infinitely superior to twice two makes four. Once you have mathematical certainty there is nothing left to do or to understand. There will be nothing left but to bottle up your five senses and plunge into contemplation. While if you stick to consciousness, even though the same result is attained, you can at least flog yourself at times, and that will, at any rate, liven you up. Reactionary as it is, corporal punishment is better than nothing. - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky -

We need to escape and understand this insanity so that their free speech does not injure others or us. Emmanuel Kant had the most convincing case why human beings were insane and specifically why liberals and the left wing are not only insane but not sensible, practical, or humans at all. Thomas Hobbes, like most other philosophers before Kant, focused on government and law to prevent “all men as each other mans potential murderer.” Not only was Emmanuel Kant convincing he presented the most detailed account why human beings were insane then added a disclaimer specifically stating it might not be practical to call them insane because they are insane; thus they are what others know them as. What kind of human being acts on the impulses of their stupidity or the reassurances of their insanity? Why naturally the superior ones who are bad subordinates and who are hated and as wrongfully worthless as their determined actions. This is not the brightest bulb in the socket of government jobs or an obligation to keep them employed for life at salaries above college professors and our best military commanders.

I ask you, gentlemen, listen sometimes to the moans of an educated man of the nineteenth century suffering from toothache, on the second or third day of the attack, when he is beginning to moan, not as he moaned on the first day, that is, not simply because he has toothache, not just as any coarse peasant, but as a man affected by progress and European civilisation, a man who is "divorced from the soil and the national elements," as they express it now-a-days. His moans become nasty, disgustingly malignant, and go on for whole days and nights. And of course he knows himself that he is doing himself no sort of good with his moans; he knows better than anyone that he is only lacerating and harassing himself and others for nothing; he knows that even the audience before whom he is making his efforts, and his whole family, listen to him with loathing, do not put a ha'porth of faith in him, and inwardly understand that he might moan differently, more simply, without trills and flourishes, and that he is only amusing himself like that from ill-humour, from malignancy. Well, in all these recognitions and disgraces it is that there lies a voluptuous pleasure. As though he would say: "I am worrying you, I am lacerating your hearts, I am keeping everyone in the house awake. Well, stay awake then, you, too, feel every minute that I have toothache. I am not a hero to you now, as I tried to seem before, but simply a nasty person, an impostor. Well, so be it, then! I am very glad that you see through me. It is nasty for you to hear my despicable moans: well, let it be nasty; here I will let you have a nastier flourish in a minute...." You do not understand even now, gentlemen? - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky -

Heidegger in the 20th Century takes what Kant penned in the 17th century to a new level and declares socialism and elemental left wing philosophy as not insane or presupposing; but the way of the ultimate Christian. Talk about the thinking weak and feeble longer. Heidegger forgot the right to live as a human being, what Thomas Hobbes penned in Britain during the 17th century also, when he declares socialism as the way to substance and God. Therefore, two evil enemies fell out of the stars and two World Wars were mistakenly based on the insanity of these stupid impulsive thinkers of the insane world. How many millions of lives were lost by way of insanity or the title of this book? Okay, so what if they do it for their own benefit and self interest, its just money right? Money never hurt anyone did it?

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — Under the watchful eye of law enforcement in 40 states, Craigslist pledged Thursday to crack down on ads for prostitution on its Web sites. As part of Craigslist's agreement with attorneys general around the country, anyone who posts an "erotic services" ad will be required to provide a working phone number and pay a fee with a valid credit card. The Web site will provide that information to law enforcement if subpoenaed. …"We don't view it as a penalty, we view it as raising the accountability," he said. "A legitimate business should have no problem with that. They should have no problem providing a phone number or credit card credentials." Craigslist filed lawsuits this week against 14 software and Internet companies that help people who post erotic service ads to circumvent the Web site's defenses against inappropriate content and illegal activity. Craigslist, which posts 30 million ads every month for everything from apartment rentals to jobs in hundreds of cities, will also begin using new search technology in an effort to help authorities find missing children and victims of human trafficking. Police across the country have been arresting people for using Web sites like Craigslist to advertise the sexual services of women and children. - Craigslist Changes Rules to Deter Illicit Sex Ads, by Pat Eaton-Robb, November 07, 2008 –

Fyodor Dostoevsky will be discussed later in this chapter on insanity, but he pens a book which will fall in the lap of both Vladimir Lenin and Karl Marx; who then acts on that insanity and builds a system to insulate and protect that insanity from any hate speech, free thought, opposition, war, and harm. Peace and security under the auspices of dogmatic psychosis was much more protected than the madness of freedom and this exposure to dirt stupid liberals, felons, and free socialists and communists. However, as an individual, you had no right to live, life, or happiness. You sold your soul to the devil and the government for both peace and security along with life employment and jobs.

Again, unlike modern writers who cite Hayek, Friedrich Von Hayek is one of the most influential thinkers within the Austrian Economic School, in the late 1960s; liberalism is never mentioned in the works of Machiavelli, Hobbes, Kant, Rousseau, Sartre, Dostoevsky, Marx, or even Hitler. However, the basis of all their writing is the basis of this chapter, the right of the individual to exist as an individual and a real human being. They no less use the word communism as they use liberalism and socialism. However, at the core of the soul of the human being lay the surface buoyancy of this dark and evil way which imprisoning and oppressing people stresses people to escape or become homicidal in an effort to find predestination, self reliance, self determination, and their own substance and soul.

Ann, you have been crying and mourning for the past ten years after I was kidnapped right out of college and held prisoner by the left and the US government. You want something which I also want so badly; a good spouse, a lasting and enduring love, and to fulfill that dream we had twenty years ago when we made a promise to a holy union through thick and thin. You have been grieved by a sense of happiness now knowing that what you had was more special then even you had known. I truly do love you and you truly do love back. You are mourning about being in the deepest love any human being can experience and you do not even know why. Do you know why? Is it because you are truly happy or is it because you are truly sad? This job satisfaction level caused our elevation to take a rocket dive and both my kidnapping and your own fight was restored with happiness, but was this enough, or is enough is enough now? The job satisfaction of talking to Hitler on a daily basis and getting angered by that sweet sewage of the left is beyond imagination, it is less than -10.

The underground sewage movement is here to stay. There are a lot of reasons to reject debt because it is such a threat. It continues a fight for an enduring problem which refuses to go away or let go of power. However, debt keeps the company who is failing alive and jobs thriving; it is a scary addiction. There are a lot of reasons to stimulate the housing industry and issue out massive amounts of mortgages to balloon the price of property and promote a ballooning retirement fund. However, over speculation and irrational exuberance always led to a disaster of a correction when reality is put in its place or put back from the heavens to the earth. Now the ballyhoo is a combination of problems such as trillions in debt, angry fist clenching accusations, stock market and market volatility, and over exuberance speed limit job loss uncontrollable.

I was kidnapped almost immediately after college in 1998 and began to experience my first maelstrom of ambushes and attacks. being new to this type of treatment, the natural order was to avoid and ignore it. The police dogs began to hunt us down. As avoiding emboldened and cause the ambushes and attacks to worsen, taking a vacation and hiding out had to be implemented. The financial, psychological, and life upside down produced an avalanched of problems and being buried with legal stress. They kept scolding about mental disorders, bad character, and some selfishness of conformity. After a long vacation hoping this nightmare would end, medical problems began arising and it led the mind to feel a higher death threat was forwarded. skin irritations, flesh eating bacteria, moles, warts, fake sexual diseases, chest congestion, salmonella poisoning, nerve agents, hair loss agents, and a general decline of health cause rigorous exercise to cease due to the lack of rewards. The harder you tried the more they cut you down and protested. Next thing we know, the entire area of Washington DC was under siege and was under attack by some terrorist and communist network. The police was after us also and joined the anti-war protest. Within a year, a false and life defeating sentence of three years, for mental disorders, was imposed as some retaliation and some other angry spontaneous misconception. that sentence was life ending and was reinstated in 2006 up till 2008 with even worse medical problems after a year of physical therapy. There was a sense that a transformation would occur and some result was necessary. They said they sought revenge and have moved on.

During the post war exuberance of victory Japan and Europe, there was a lot of confidence and rebuilding. Those who served in war were given a chance to obtain education and housing. The financial crisis of 2008 was began by the same New Deal and Keynesian aggregate formulas; but it basically forgave all of the financial principles which economics is based on such as having an education and job prior to buying a house with a thirty year mortgage. Housing crisis never recover; the industry is so lucrative and has experienced such caution and worry because of the long term implications. If you apply Keynesian and short term manipulations to a long term problem, you will have a disaster. In a climate with over 20 trillion in national debt and market volatility and political instability; it is a death trap. So long as the sewage movement is underground, they deserve to be terrorized and flogged for this underground swing vote sewage defiance.

An analysis of knowledge also requires a distinction between synthetic and analytic truths. In an analytic claim, the predicate is contained within the subject. In the claim, "Every body occupies space," the property of occupying space is revealed in an analysis of what it means to be a body. The subject of a synthetic claim, however, does not contain the predicate. ...A synthetic a priori claim, Kant argues, is one that must be true without appealing to experience, yet the predicate is not logically contained within the subject, so it is no surprise that the Empiricists failed to produce the sought after justification. ...So if we are to solve the problems generated by Empiricism and Rationalism, the central question of metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason reduces to "How are synthetic a priori judgments possible?" (19) If we can answer that question, then we can determine the possibility, legitimacy, and range of all metaphysical claims. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

When the promotion of a pension fund linked to long term market instability and immediate exuberance promoted the stimulus of all out mortgage hysteria; the question is what percentage of that long term became short term only. Until someone can figure out what long term and short term reality is; most people who have their entire life savings anchored to the volatility of the market and the housing industry are holding onto bail out money, deposits, and real and unreal foreclosures. What is real and unreal when you have an artificial economy and no care about disaster coming? That is liberalism; it only is concerned with existing conditions and the system which can cope with existing conditions. In the end and with conclusive summary, liberalism, left wing politics, and financial disaster always leads to political strife and warfare. This is inevitable and predestination because of this problem with the right of the individual to exist. So much can be made of the underground slush of sewage movement which just makes every nation stink worse than it truly is. The sign does not say the United States of Immigrant sewage so let’s not get upset by these dirt stupid and worthless invaders.

Nicolaus Copernicus (February 19, 1473 – May 24, 1543) was the first astronomer to formulate a scientifically-based heliocentric cosmology that displaced the Earth from the center of the universe. His epochal book, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres), is often regarded as the starting point of modern astronomy and the defining epiphany that began the Scientific Revolution. … his publication of a scientific theory of heliocentrism, demonstrating that the motions of celestial objects can be explained without putting the Earth at rest in the center of the universe, stimulated further scientific investigations and became a landmark in the history of modern science that is known as the Copernican Revolution. – Wikipedia -

This is the same jingoism Emmanuel Kant addressed with one pen stroke. Financial pressure and poverty increases stress, anxiety, crime, and even violence. Those stressors cause the surface pressure of psychopathic, lunatic, and a string of deception we consistently and knowing observe from the left wing and liberals. Therefore, political challenge, political struggle, lack of order, and this overwhelming human condition get worse with scarcity. This is why the right of the invaluable is so badly threatened and so grossly violated when scarcity shoots up or when job loss drums up discontent. Debt keeps the order. Martial law is also another way to keep order.

For if a desire should come into conflict with reason we shall then reason and not desire, because it will be impossible retaining our reason to be SENSELESS in our desires, and in that way knowingly act against reason and desire to injure ourselves. And as all choice and reasoning can be really calculated--because there will some day be discovered the laws of our so-called free will--so, joking apart, there may one day be something like a table constructed of them, so that we really shall choose in accordance with it. If, for instance, some day they calculate and prove to me that I made a long nose at someone because I could not help making a long nose at him and that I had to do it in that particular way, what FREEDOM is left me, especially if I am a learned man and have taken my degree somewhere? Then I should be able to calculate my whole life for thirty years beforehand. In short, if this could be arranged there would be nothing left for us to do; anyway, we should have to understand that. And, in fact, we ought unwearyingly to repeat to ourselves that at such and such a time and in such and such circumstances nature does not ask our leave; that we have got to take her as she is and not fashion her to suit our fancy, and if we really aspire to formulas and tables of rules, and well, even ... to the chemical retort, there's no help for it, we must accept the retort too, or else it will be accepted without our consent...." - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky –

The right to tax is a tremendous threat to the right of the invaluable to exist when it leads to more debt and no way to pay it back. A human being can be transformed when scarcity skyrockets or when they are kidnapped and life is shut down. The scare to the city is the right to tax and the right to live and not be transformed by this scarcity struggle. The left wing and the liberals feel harm or the infliction of harm, an obligation, retaliation, and an individual choice to survive and live. The mental clarity is not there and is a spontaneous eruption of calculations to restore job loss and resort to human pride and domination. This is the basis of peace, security, scarcity, and warfare between the right and left wing.

Is communism a legal concept? If God and knowledge are substance, the communism is not a legal concept. What it is and what it tries to replace is a breach in this relationship with substance or God. That breach and that relationship with God must be healed by another system which can provide life or existence, some ideology or life force. If you take away a world with no substance or a world with no understand of the devil, you get the reverse effect, the devil. Now knowledge is evil. Now substance is evil. Now everybody is a prisoner to the devil and the devil is in our life. It is not illegal to kill the devil; it cannot be renationalized as killing of substance or subject. Does this mean we kill everybody evil? No, it means that the protected class is not the devil class. It means these obligations to the devil class are a beach to God or substance and must be healed by something, perhaps oppression and warfare. You must beat down evil, not let it prosper or take the lead.

Kant says this jingoism is false and a fraud and his protégé, Hegel, adjoining to his work declared human beings not only insane but no damn good. Hegel has been discussed in previous chapters as saying the same determined knowledge as substance, religion, and God; then unified by politics and the will to fight or life. Kant, the mentor of Hegel, began this rationalization of the metaphysical or the spiritual world which he says was flawed and lacking in science first. Kant says this flaw, the unity of empiricism and rationalism, was only used to escape the conditions which trapped human minds and to block the knowledge not within or best for self, a what is best for me approach to greed and financial problems. Kant began the discussion with elaborate and concise recitation of previous philosophers. Kant finally concludes that empiricism and rationalism had committed this error many times before and Kant corrected the problems by making distinct an inadequacy of science or statistics in understanding, making understandable, and fulfilling the understanding of the metaphysical, that of and from the heavens.

Locke had also argued that the mind is a blank slate, or a tabula rasa, that becomes populated with ideas by its interactions with the world. Experience teaches us everything, including concepts of relationship, identity, causation, and so on. Kant argues that the blank slate model of the mind is insufficient to explain the beliefs about objects that we have; some components of our beliefs must be brought by the mind to experience. ...Hume maintains that we cannot provide a priori or a posteriori justifications for a number of our beliefs like, "Objects and subjects persist identically over time," or "Every event must have a cause." In Hume's hands, it becomes clear that empiricism cannot give us an epistemological justification for the claims about objects, subjects, and causes that we took to be most obvious and certain about the world. ...Kant expresses deep dissatisfaction with the idealistic and seemingly skeptical results of the empirical lines of inquiry. In each case, Kant gives a number of arguments to show that Locke's, Berkeley's, and Hume's empiricist positions are untenable because they necessarily presupposes the very claims they set out to disprove. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

Kant also says these persuasions and influence of empiricism intends on creating a system. By escaping what trapped the mind from the external world, the intrinsic value of the world is lost by the self. This was expanded on by Kant as a way to see the external world as confined to the intrinsic value confined to the mind of self. This is the vulnerable insanity which Kant describes in explaining the metaphysical; the right to live and the right to exist as an individual is based on the relationship with God, self, and the external world. The persuasion of world view was the stimuli of mental order which sought out system or order. Kant therefore says that empiricism and rationalism is only a vulnerability which humans use to persuade a system or set up a system but the infallibility of order is the ability of the thinking human being to become qualified and qualitative in having a right to exist as an individual. Kant says this is impossible with rationalism and empiricism, or science alone. All it does is seek to imprison or capture the qualitative view with innumerable science.

Kant's Refutation of Material Idealism works against Descartes' project as well as Berkeley's. Descartes believed that he could infer the existence of objects in space outside of him based on his awareness of his own existence coupled with an argument that God exists and is not deceiving him about the evidence of his senses. Kant argues in the Refutation chapter that knowledge of external objects cannot be inferential. Rather, the capacity to be aware of one's own existence in Descartes' famous cogito argument already presupposes that existence of objects in space and time outside of me. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

Philosophical debates are very difficult to understand because the majority of the postulates are mentally deranged and will give you that “ice cream headache” (Coulter) we all get from liberalism and lunacy of disorder. Kant’s explanation is so concise and so detailed, he breaks apart the bias and the influence of the bias; the metaphysical or the relationship with God, man, and the external world. Kant is able to expose this bias by comparing his own knowledge with the external then to seek the approval of the external. Kant not only feels his self justification and arguments are significant, but he empowers them to be soldiers against the struggles of this world by giving them the gift of the metaphysical or heaven. That is the difference between the right to exist of the left and the right political wings; it seeks the approval of others in the most honest form of substance. Thus far, everything Kant says has no sanctity of value or calculatedly value, unlike Keynesian economics which seeks to justify value by calculating the bias and system, what Kant says presupposes. Therefore, you cannot act on or predict the calculation but you must instead accept the righteousness of an authentic analysis, the free hand of the heavens and the free market.

According to the Rationalist and Empiricist traditions, the mind is passive either because it finds itself possessing innate, well-formed ideas ready for analysis, or because it receives ideas of objects into a kind of empty theater, or blank slate. Kant's crucial insight here is to argue that experience of a world as we have it is only possible if the mind provides a systematic structuring of its representations. This structuring is below the level of, or logically prior to, the mental representations that the Empiricists and Rationalists analyzed. Their epistemological and metaphysical theories could not adequately explain the sort of judgments or experience we have because they only considered the results of the mind's interaction with the world, not the nature of the mind's contribution. Kant's methodological innovation was to employ what he calls a transcendental argument to prove synthetic a priori claims. Typically, a transcendental argument attempts to prove a conclusion about the necessary structure of knowledge on the basis of an incontrovertible mental act. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

The second part after the bias of science was explained succinctly was ideology. Kant described this second part as the ideology of greed. Kant makes an argument which confronts a conspiracy of greed and system. Kant says that empiricism and rationalism caused and led to the assertion of experience as the source of ideas. Kant notices that flawed bias was based on a temporary insanity which was maturing the individual to this bias. They were unaware and uncaring to the existing condition ten or twenty years from heretofore. Therefore, Kant sets up the knowing mind with the postulate that knowledge only knows to the experience with which it is currently aware of, that which is external. That knowledge revolutionized our world view and the way we perceive events shaping our life and the world. It is knowledge of a secret which unlocks and unravels the true meanings and the true identities. Naturally, his revolution was against insane thinkers and insane politics and insane economics and least of all an insane world.

These arguments lead Kant to conclude that the Empiricists' assertion that experience is the source of all our ideas. It must be the mind's structuring, Kant argues, that makes experience possible. If there are features of experience that the mind brings to objects rather than given to the mind by objects, that would explain why they are indispensable to experience but unsubstantiated in it. And that would explain why we can give a transcendental argument for the necessity of these features. Kant thought that Berkeley and Hume identified at least part of the mind's a priori contribution to experience with the list of claims that they said were unsubstantiated on empirical grounds: "Every event must have a cause," "There are mind-independent objects that persist over time," and "Identical subjects persist over time." The empiricist project must be incomplete since these claims are necessarily presupposed in our judgments, a point Berkeley and Hume failed to see. So, Kant argues that a philosophical investigation into the nature of the external world must be as much an inquiry into the features and activity of the mind that knows it. ...The appropriate starting place for any philosophical inquiry into knowledge, Kant decides, is with the mind that can have that knowledge. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

The third part of Emmanuel Kant’s Copernican Revolution, named after Copernicus the astronomer, is why human beings reject or despise God. This is where Kant finds is sweet spot in the metaphysical and the mystery of religion. Kant says human beings are insane and are completely unaware or unconcerned about this because their unity and determination to seek knowledge and substance is flawed by some lacking inadequacy or insecurity; maybe even narcissism. Whatever the case, the third part is built on insane thinkers, bias, bad science, bad system, and religion or world views. Kant takes this one step further and says his pure reason must seek some practicality because human beings embody this smooth flow to achieve this pure reason also, the determined unity to find substance or meaning in life.

The project of the Critique of Pure Reason is also challenging because in the analysis of the mind's transcendental contributions to experience we must employ the mind, the only tool we have, to investigate the mind. We must use the faculties of knowledge to determine the limits of knowledge, so Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is both a critique that takes pure reason as its subject matter, and a critique that is conducted by pure reason. ...Another way to understand Kant's point here is that it is impossible for us to have any experience of objects that are not in time and space. Furthermore, space and time themselves cannot be perceived directly, so they must be the form by which experience of objects is had. A consciousness that apprehends objects directly, as they are in themselves and not by means of space and time, is possible--God, Kant says, has a purely intuitive consciousness--but our apprehension of objects is always mediated by the conditions of sensibility. Any discursive or concept using consciousness (A 230/B 283) like ours must apprehend objects as occupying a region of space and persisting for some duration of time. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

Kant says that religion presupposes a mystery by “venturing into speculative and underground metaphysics.” It is neither a flaw of thinking too little or too much, Kant says it is a mystery until experience catches up with time and space. Kant says, “All knowledge which is occupied not so much with objects as with the model of our knowledge of objects in so far as this mode of knowledge is to be a priori.” He says that he is only challenging the critique of other thinkers and this transcendental knowledge, or self knowing, to the world experiences by employing what is of this earth or relevant tools of human beings to knowledge. Dostoevsky will arise in the 19th century to challenge Kant with his utopian understanding and Marxist philosophy to substance and God. However, Kant makes it clear that flaws of the human being and the transcendental mental laziness will lead to a flaw in pure reason. Dostoevsky saw those flaws as oppression or the chains of the capitalistic system to transform the human being into a human monster or a ticking time bomb of poverty. Again, this is the reason why the right to exist as a human being is used back and forth in a dangerous political shuffle and circus of debt.

The problem that Kant points out is that a Humean association of ideas already presupposes that we can conceive of identical, persistent objects that have regular, predictable, causal behavior. And being able to conceive of objects in this rich sense presupposes that the mind makes several a priori contributions. I must be able to separate the objects from each other in my sensations, and from my sensations of myself. I must be able to attribute properties to the objects. I must be able to conceive of an external world with its own course of events that is separate from the stream of perceptions in my consciousness. These components of experience cannot be found in experience because they constitute it. The mind's a priori conceptual contribution to experience can be enumerated by a special set of concepts that make all other empirical concepts and judgments possible. These concepts cannot be experienced directly; they are only manifest as the form which particular judgments of objects take. Kant believes that formal logic has already revealed what the fundamental categories of thought are. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

If you read the works of all philosophers and even the all knowing Kant and those after him, the term liberalism will never be mentioned or known until the post modern era after World War II. Probably the most conscripting classical thinker is Hayek who describes conservative and liberalism as a fluctuation between relationships of Great Britain and America, a sense of independence and freedom. Kant describes the phenomenon of liberals as au contraire to his own lack of beliefs and his scientific unbiased knowledge; but also the ability to project anything on this bias or flaw, “without sensibility no object would be given to us; and without understanding no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind.”

Then the "Palace of Crystal" will be built. Then ... In fact, those will be halcyon days. Of course there is no guaranteeing (this is my comment) that it will not be, for instance, frightfully dull then (for what will one have to do when everything will be calculated and tabulated), but on the other hand everything will be extraordinarily rational. Of course boredom may lead you to anything. It is boredom sets one sticking golden pins into people, but all that would not matter. What is bad (this is my comment again) is that I dare say people will be thankful for the gold pins then. Man is stupid, you know, phenomenally stupid; or rather he is not at all stupid, but he is so ungrateful that you could not find another like him in all creation. I, for instance, would not be in the least surprised if all of a sudden, A PROPOS of nothing, in the midst of general prosperity a gentleman with an ignoble, or rather with a reactionary and ironical, countenance were to arise and, putting his arms akimbo, say to us all: "I say, gentleman, hadn't we better kick over the whole show and scatter rationalism to the winds, simply to send these logarithms to the devil, and to enable us to live once more at our own sweet foolish will!" That again would not matter, but what is annoying is that he would be sure to find followers--such is the nature of man. - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky -

The fourth part of epistemology and cosmology to Kant is the most controversial. It is controversial because it is the part which Dostoevsky wrote about and complained about, judgment. This judgment lends to some action and some action against liberals and the left wing, what to do with them and what to do about them after judgment? How do you fix the pressure of scarcity and this so called transformation of the human being into some monster or some killer who does not respect the right of the individual to exist but to judge back this right to exist, a social justice? The people answered this and those who were his protégés dealt with the ultimate Christian, weak and strong forces canceling each other out, social systems, economic systems, etc… all of whom lead to warfare and billions of human death, not millions but billions counting ahead of the future of this containment. It led to violence level of non-proportional levels and this idea that a human being has a right to exist as an individual.

Since objects can only be experienced spatiotemporally, the only application of concepts that yields knowledge is to the empirical, spatiotemporal world. Beyond that realm, there can be no sensations of objects for the understanding to judge, rightly or wrongly. Since intuitions of the physical world are lacking when we speculate about what lies beyond, metaphysical knowledge, or knowledge of the world outside the physical, is impossible. Claiming to have knowledge from the application of concepts beyond the bounds of sensation results in the empty and illusory transcendent metaphysics of Rationalism that Kant reacts against. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

Kant has an answer and he gives it in three parts. First Kant says that by categorizing the empirical data of science can be compiled in analysis. Every judgment and every understanding must have empirical data and this categorizing effect of science. Ultimately and eventually, the knowledge will surface or be transcendental from the heavens, the voice of God as all knowing and all perceiving. Kant makes clear he does not like rash judgments, false science, synthetic analysis, and innocent human beings hurt. He makes clear a detail and all encompassing thoroughness and then holds skepticism and apprehension to reason and practicality, an art form. Kant concludes that life is an art form with no science to it; maybe experience or threats or even necessity. Kant does not say the political process, a dictator, the church, the community, or survival. However, we know the right to exist as a human being causes war and conflict; a final judgment. That judgment then causes a reactionary judgment or an enemy to judgment.

It should be pointed out, however, that Kant is not endorsing an idealism about objects like Berkeley's. That is, Kant does not believe that material objects are unknowable or impossible. While Kant is a transcendental idealist--he believes the nature of objects as they are in themselves is unknowable to us--knowledge of appearances is nevertheless possible. As noted above, in The Refutation of Material Idealism, Kant argues that the ordinary self-consciousness that Berkeley and Descartes would grant implies "the existence of objects in space outside me." (B 275) Consciousness of myself would not be possible if I were not able to make determinant judgments about objects that exist outside of me and have states that are independent of the of my inner experience. Another way to put the point is to say that the fact that the mind of the knower makes the a priori contribution does not mean that space and time or the categories are mere figments of the imagination. Kant is an empirical realist about the world we experience; we can know objects as they appear to us. He gives a robust defense of science and the study of the natural world from his argument about the mind's role in making nature. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

Kant in his second judgment declares assertion of the individual. Kant says it is his duty to assert who he is for his own survival or what will be covered later as duty or deontology. Human beings must state who they are, who they are against, which judgment they are reacting to, and he will judge them based on who he is. Kant states clearly who he is and what he does is in direct correlation to what others are. Kant also rejects value and calculations as the refutation of material idealism, what Dostoevsky declares later as utopian philosophy. Kant says that in order to assert oneself, this pure reason and practicality must be employed to battle the reaction of judgment or material idealism, the economics of numbers and scarcity. He makes clear the notion of wilderness and how humans in nature are unknowing and unknowable to others, the basis of liberalism, fundamentalism, and orthodoxy. Taken to the extreme it becomes dogma and religion. Take it to a system level and it becomes the machinery of warfare; that which threatens the right of the individual to exist. Again, Kant does not pass judgment but he merely states who he is has to do with who others are; a form of existentialism or reactionary judgment. If his self existence is threatened, then practicality to pure reason is flawed; the immersion of environment as he saw it or being behind enemy lines. The laws of supply and demand govern this struggle over scarcity and a right to exist.

The palace of crystal may be an idle dream, it may be that it is inconsistent with the laws of nature and that I have invented it only through my own stupidity, through the old-fashioned irrational habits of my generation. But what does it matter to me that it is inconsistent? That makes no difference since it exists in my desires, or rather exists as long as my desires exist. Perhaps you are laughing again? Laugh away; I will put up with any mockery rather than pretend that I am satisfied when I am hungry. I know, anyway, that I will not be put off with a compromise, with a recurring zero, simply because it is consistent with the laws of nature and actually exists. I will not accept as the crown of my desires a block of buildings with tenements for the poor on a lease of a thousand years, and perhaps with a sign-board of a dentist hanging out. Destroy my desires, eradicate my ideals, show me something better, and I will follow you. You will say, perhaps, that it is not worth your trouble; but in that case I can give you the same answer. We are discussing things seriously; but if you won't deign to give me your attention, I will drop your acquaintance. I can retreat into my underground hole. - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky –

In his third judgment, Kant states a cause effect relationship. What are the tolerances or the practicality of judgments when applying pure reason? To Dostoevsky, every judgment is a reactionary threat to him and who he is. To Kant, how much judgment without abandoning pure reason makes relationships and warfare both possible and impossible? Again, he states this transcendental level of knowledge. The idea in the third judgment is a cause-effect, an incompatible difficult in life, a conflict of struggle, and a permanent disappointment with failure and the stupidity with the reactions against the burden of pure reason. Kant declares the human world insane and misusing the judgments he has detailed with absolute thoroughness.

Much of Kant's argument can be seen as subjective, not because of variations from mind to mind, but because the source of necessity and universality is in the mind of the knowing subject, not in objects themselves. Kant draws several conclusions about what is necessarily true of any consciousness that employs the faculties of sensibility and understanding to produce empirical judgments. As we have seen, a mind that employs concepts must have a receptive faculty that provides the content of judgments. Space and time are the necessary forms of apprehension for the receptive faculty. The mind that has experience must also have a faculty of combination or synthesis, the imagination for Kant, that apprehends the data of sense, reproduces it for the understanding, and recognizes their features according to the conceptual framework provided by the categories. The mind must also have a faculty of understanding that provides empirical concepts and the categories for judgment. The various faculties that make judgment possible must be unified into one mind. And it must be identical over time if it is going to apply its concepts to objects over time. Kant here addresses Hume's famous assertion that introspection reveals nothing more than a bundle of sensations that we group together and call the self. Judgments would not be possible, Kant maintains, if the mind that senses is not the same as the mind that possesses the forms of sensibility. And that mind must be the same as the mind that employs the table of categories, that contributes empirical concepts to judgment, and that synthesizes the whole into knowledge of a unified, empirical world. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

Sustainable development and the principles behind the singularity or the totality of this book deal with a perpetual tutelage to the future to correct it and find equilibriums. It is both the law of conservation and the physical laws of entropy and thermo dynamics which shift back and forth in a beneficial and self sustaining perpetual way. There is a lot of invisibility because the future of the unborn and long term knowledge is what determines the price or the cost values. If there are future inefficiencies or future irregularities, it must be addressed or else it builds in a negative and cost deficient way. Therefore, dealing with existing conditions and dealing with future conditions are where liberalism and conservatism differ, the spontaneity of the present chaos. Volatility is not what sustainability or tolerable certainty is based on. One of the biggest problems to this market forced structure and collapse is liberalism, left wing economics, communism, socialism and reactionary conflict or struggle. This is the devil or the enemy described as simply empty, hollow, and with a clean slate to react negatively to each judgment because it is not beneficial to self or some intrinsic synthetic value. The minds eye is able to fuse together this knowledge, the determined search for this knowledge, this unity of determination, and this idea that God is substance.

The full extent of Kant's Copernican revolution becomes even clearer in the rest of the Analytic of Principles. That is, the role of the mind in making nature is not limited to space, time, and the categories. In the Analytic of Principles, Kant argues that even the necessary conformity of objects to natural law arises from the mind. Thus far, Kant's transcendental method has permitted him to reveal the a priori components of sensations, the a priori concepts. In the sections titled the Axioms, Anticipations, Analogies, and Postulates, he argues that there are a priori judgments that must necessarily govern all appearances of objects. These judgments are a function of the table of categories' role in determining all possible judgments, so the four sections map onto the four headings of that table. I include all of the a priori judgments, or principles, here to illustrate the earlier claims about Kant's empirical realism, and to show the intimate relationship Kant saw between his project and that of the natural sciences… - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

Kant explodes with a new vocabulary for this revolution of his, called his dialectic. It is in terms of effectively rationalizing and concisely describing what was once the spiritual world and the invisible world, a view into the window of the world and the deep impacting problems which threatens the right of the individual to exist as a human being. It is and up to this point the best explanation with will touch off an explosion afterwards and a counter revolutionary movement to substance, God, freedom, and the human right to exist as a knowing and thinking human being. Kant developed a very complex set of terms to his knowledge and his way of thinking such as paralogism, antinomies, architectonic, and others. However, his deontology is what holds all of his knowledge and intrinsic knowledge to a realistic and determined reality. He clearly notates that humans are insane but he does not mention Thomas Hobbes and his approach to war and judgment, that human beings are no damn good.

For a philosopher to impact as many different areas as Kant did is extraordinary. His ethical theory has been as, if not more, influential than his work in epistemology and metaphysics. Most of Kant's work on ethics is presented in two works. The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) is Kant's "search for and establishment of the supreme principle of morality." In The Critique of Practical Reason (1787) Kant attempts to unify his account of practical reason with his work in the Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is the primary proponent in history of what is called deontological ethics. Deontology is the study of duty. On Kant's view, the sole feature that gives an action moral worth is not the outcome that is achieved by the action, but the motive that is behind the action. The categorical imperative is Kant's famous statement of this duty: "Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law." ...The metaphysical facts about the ultimate nature of things in themselves must remain a mystery to us because of the spatiotemporal constraints on sensibility. When we think about the nature of things in themselves or the ultimate ground of the empirical world, Kant has argued that we are still constrained to think through the categories, we cannot think otherwise, but we can have no knowledge because sensation provides our concepts with no content. - Matt McCormick, California State University, Sacramento, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy -

Kant based his deontology as duty, it is the human duty of human beings to exist or have this determination if they are willing to struggle and survive. Understandably, his nemesis Dostoevsky will come along in the eighteenth century to break this calm thought and trust of knowledge. Dostoevsky based his urgency on the idea that government was he and he is a doctor whose duty is never to turn away a patient who has a toothache. That duty will be discussed later but Kant does not get facetious and satirical in his critique in stating how the science of substance or to become substance is a mirror of life. God and life was a mystery and the deontology or duty was judged on the ability to be educated on facts and opinions.

I am a sick man.... I am a spiteful man. I am an unattractive man. I believe my liver is diseased. However, I know nothing at all about my disease, and do not know for certain what ails me. I don't consult a doctor for it, and never have, though I have a respect for medicine and doctors. Besides, I am extremely superstitious, sufficiently so to respect medicine, anyway (I am well-educated enough not to be superstitious, but I am superstitious). No, I refuse to consult a doctor from spite. That you probably will not understand. Well, I understand it, though. Of course, I can't explain who it is precisely that I am mortifying in this case by my spite: I am perfectly well aware that I cannot "pay out" the doctors by not consulting them; I know better than anyone that by all this I am only injuring myself and no one else. But still, if I don't consult a doctor it is from spite. My liver is bad, well--let it get worse! - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky -

Similarly, those opinions change as time worsens this scarcity and depletion of resources; you must find sustainability or perpetual growth. If you spontaneously excite the moment by this flaw in science or irrational exuberance; it can be a fatality. You will want the strongest substance humanly possible with practicality and pure reason. Kant is merely detailing a circular system which feeds upon itself and regenerates new knowledge to a determined level which he is not yet able to experience but is determined by substance or God. Once he knows how the world works, he can go and assert himself with knowledge and his understanding of it. That is his duty. Again, as mentioned from the start, it is a mysterious but a spiritual duty, an intrinsic ethic only known to him and which he seeks approval by asserting himself. He feels that his lack of insanity and his god like sensibility is authentic and will outlast any other knowledge on earth. He is not insane but he is not any damn good either because it was intrinsic to him and his knowledge. In one pen stroke, Kant summons the Gods on earth.

Perhaps I was the only one in the office who fancied that I was a coward and a slave, and I fancied it just because I was more highly developed. But it was not only that I fancied it, it really was so. I was a coward and a slave. I say this without the slightest embarrassment. Every decent man of our age must be a coward and a slave. That is his normal condition. Of that I am firmly persuaded. He is made and constructed to that very end. And not only at the present time owing to some casual circumstances, but always, at all times, a decent man is bound to be a coward and a slave. It is the law of nature for all decent people all over the earth. If anyone of them happens to be valiant about something, he need not be comforted nor carried away by that; he would show the white feather just the same before something else. That is how it invariably and inevitably ends. Only donkeys and mules are valiant, and they only till they are pushed up to the wall. It is not worth while to pay attention to them for they really are of no consequence. - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky –

Dostoevsky and Kant are mortal enemies. The ambiance of Dostoevsky’s works have insidiously inspired insipid revolutionary thinkers who scientifically, like Kant, lay forth the blueprint for the biggest counter reaction to science, pure reason, statistics, and duty in the 19th Century of pre-modernization transition. The difference between Dostoevsky and French revolutionary work is the field of headaches. Dostoevsky is one of the most entertaining and convincing writers of Marxism beyond Marx himself, his insanity is problematically one of the most enjoying masterpieces a person of determined knowledge and substance can read. The stark differences between Kant and Dostoevsky are very acute and even deadly. It is so deadly, circus trials are held to terrorize the public into submission and even reprisals. However, the basis of the underground is this fundamental right of the individual to exist by individual talents and intelligence; the respect of it and the value of it as well.

He shook hands with me in a friendly, but not over-friendly, fashion, with a sort of circumspect courtesy like that of a General, as though in giving me his hand he were warding off something. I had imagined, on the contrary, that on coming in he would at once break into his habitual thin, shrill laugh and fall to making his insipid jokes and witticisms. I had been preparing for them ever since the previous day, but I had not expected such condescension, such high-official courtesy. So, then, he felt himself ineffably superior to me in every respect! If he only meant to insult me by that high-official tone, it would not matter, I thought--I could pay him back for it one way or another. But what if, in reality, without the least desire to be offensive, that sheepshead had a notion in earnest that he was superior to me and could only look at me in a patronizing way? The very supposition made me gasp. - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky –

Notes from the Underground probably ranks above Marx and even Kant or Hegel in influencing the world view and the revolutionary mindset of world views at or around the turn of the 20th century. It is the axiom of liberalism and the soul of literary liberalism as we know it outside of Sartre or Rousseau who present arguments of philosophical being, not of science and soul. To the thinking human being, their works are almost impossible to comprehend and to the curious and intrepid mind, Dostoevsky is stimulating to his end and much more impacting in his approach to define soul and world view, again the art which Kant describes as practicality and pure reason in conflict. If the world was insane, then Dostoevsky was its own entertainment. The main antithesis Dostoevsky brings to the surface is this, here is a pot of money, and do you want to walk away from it? That is what his message is and not many human beings can resist the temptation of his message. It is clearly evident why Dostoevsky explains the deadly nature of the underground and notes why it is underground.

Don't remind me that I have just rejected the palace of crystal for the sole reason that one cannot put out one's tongue at it. I did not say because I am so fond of putting my tongue out. Perhaps the thing I resented was, that of all your edifices there has not been one at which one could not put out one's tongue. On the contrary, I would let my tongue be cut off out of gratitude if things could be so arranged that I should lose all desire to put it out. It is not my fault that things cannot be so arranged, and that one must be satisfied with model flats. Then why am I made with such desires? Can I have been constructed simply in order to come to the conclusion that all my construction is a cheat? Can this be my whole purpose? I do not believe it. But do you know what: I am convinced that we underground folk ought to be kept on a curb. Though we may sit forty years underground without speaking, when we do come out into the light of day and break out we talk and talk and talk.... - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky –

The entire piece of Dostoevsky is a sublime adventure that which Samuel Coleridge described as the “underground river.” The underground river is also the theme of another movie called “A River Runs through It” where a river represents time and a place to “lift over rocks” to see what has been left or underneath. Dostoevsky’s novel “Notes from the Underground” is this similar river and it has an broad honest reasoning for the opposition against Kant and also the honest underground which was quickly and facedly taking shape during the revolutionary periods.

Critics have tended to read the Underground Man's rant as a direct expression of the author's view, though it contains so many contradictions that it cannot be said to express any view, directly. I would like to step back from the text, set aside the problem of the author's intention,1 and read the text anew as fiction, to ask, despite the Underground Man's frequent jibes at Kant's theory of "the sublime and the beautiful" in Dostoevsky's Notes from Underground (14),2 is there a more profound sense in which Dostoevsky affirms Kant's theory? …The fundamental principle of the categorical imperative, recall, is this: "Act on that maxim which can at the same time have for its object itself as a universal law of nature" (Kant, Groundwork 105 [81]).3 While Kant has traditionally been criticized for the rigidity of this standard of universality, particularly in cases where seemingly universalizable beliefs come into conflict, we should note that Kant's placement of adherence to law as the highest principle embodies a regard for others that is not entailed by moral skepticism. The skeptic allows no adjudication of conflicting moral principles, because they are rooted in private sentiment, and not facts that could be subject to reason. Kant's test demands that moral principles be universalizable in form. - “Kant’s Aesthetics in Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground” by David Goldfarb, Newsletter of the Society for Russian Religious Philosophy, Spring 1995, pg. 11-19, Columbia University -

What makes Dostoevsky such a profound influence on Marx and Lenin is his ability to use rational thought to his ends, the crystal palace. What makes it even more entertaining is the absence of this knowledge, existing in the world wild, which causes him to become a laudable laughing stock of all literature. Under all of that violence and war is a comedic underground laughing at the jackass of playbook by the liberals and the left wing trash dump. That is the underground now and why they are bankrupt by their own existence. To escape that existence, they must destroy themselves and commit suicide.

The narrator must be "lying," adopting a pose here, however, because his strongest argument is saved for the very Kantian notion of a "pleasure of despair" (7),8 or a masochistic, sublime pleasure in pain. For Kant, the feeling of the sublime is . . . a feeling of pain arising from the want of accordance between the aesthetical estimation of magnitude formed by the imagination and the estimation of the same formed by reason. There is at the same time a pleasure thus excited, arising from the correspondence with rational ideas of this very judgment of the inadequacy of our greatest faculty of the sense, in so far as it is a law for us to strive after these ideas (Kant, Judgement 96, my emphasis). … The moans of a toothache, for instance, "express the sufferer's enjoyment,"9 the narrator says. Particularly they "express all the aimlessness of the pain which consciousness finds so humiliating, the whole system of natural laws about which you really don't give a damn, but as a result of which you're suffering nonetheless, while nature isn't" (10-11).10 The humiliation of consciousness in the face of nature's limitlessness is exactly Kant's description of the feeling of the sublime. The sublime is the pain resulting from the failure of reason to comprehend the immensity of quantity in nature.11 - “Kant’s Aesthetics in Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground” by David Goldfarb, Newsletter of the Society for Russian Religious Philosophy, Spring 1995, pg. 11-19, Columbia University -

The power of his message from the Underground or this lack of unity and determination to substance is not only felt but is a duality in nature. It is powerful, it is not just a novel, it is real, it is entertaining, and it mesmerizes the mind to a life lacking freedom or individual choices. Naturally, there is a lot more responsibility Dostoevsky left out of the underground, but his message concerns the existing conditions and the moment of life suspended in poverty. His novel mesmerizes the mind in suggesting it does not have to be this way, life can be different if and when you make that choice to join the revolution which at this time is also underground and gaining momentum. The power to resist this jackass dump of failure is conjured up by the truth which exposes their lies, failure, and robin hook incompetence. This is why the underground, the sublime, and lies have no valuable or credible life on the other side.

Though a detailed analysis of the second part of the Notes from Underground is beyond the scope of this paper, we might observe that we can read it as a demonstration of the Kantian pursuit of the sublime. Each event in succession--the attempt to get thrown out of a bar, the clash with the officer on the Nevsky Prospekt, the confrontation building to the challenge of Zverkov to a duel, the abuse of Apollon, the servant, and finally the sentimental seduction of Liza that results in a treacherous rape--pushes the limits of violence and humiliation further and further. In each case the the object of the Underground Man's offense is increasingly helpless, while his psychological relation to his object is closer, increasing the depth of possible shame. He has constructed a sequence of events in which, as he states earlier, "each thing will be more repugnant than the last" (40).15 This sequential and additive violation of the moral boundaries might be taken as the moral enactment of dialogue. Each scene entails a boundary to be violated through its loophole. The state of continuous violation is a way of remaining suspended in the sublime, and in the end, the Underground Man indicates that he really does know the difference between the "beautiful and sublime," when he asks, "Which is better: cheap happiness or sublime suffering?" (88).16 - “Kant’s Aesthetics in Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground” by David Goldfarb, Newsletter of the Society for Russian Religious Philosophy, Spring 1995, pg. 11-19, Columbia University -

As flawed and as feeble as the message from the underground, it was able to win fights and many fights by terrorizing this world into a submission to the dumbest and most trash bound segment of society by giving up that right of the individual to exist and succumbing to law and system. It is too bad time cannot be reversed and lives cannot be put back together because if it could be, the underground would have to ask if they would or whether they would be willing to fix this lasting toothache. The story of the underground is merely a plot to rob a bank or some wealthy individual by suggesting how life can be afterwards. You win fights when you have nothing and must fight for power; once you choose to fight the universe and the wrath of God, chances are a transformation will awaken; the satanic spawn of a failure and a loser who does not believe wholeheartedly on individual talents and intelligence.

Why are you explaining? Why do you apologise? Well, there it is, I answer. There is a whole psychology in all this, though. Perhaps it is simply that I am a coward. And perhaps that I purposely imagine an audience before me in order that I may be more dignified while I write. There are perhaps thousands of reasons. Again, what is my object precisely in writing? If it is not for the benefit of the public why should I not simply recall these incidents in my own mind without putting them on paper? - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky –

Keep in mind, in order to successfully pull it off, the police must be replaced and assurances made to an ability to escape capture and prosecution. However, Dostoevsky does not speak of whose money he is raiding or how much money he has and will gain from this heist. He cannot tell these partners in crime how long this loot will last them and whether or not they will one day regret their decisions. The way to remove the police and the military to stop that police is to coup or overthrow the government by either peaceful or violent means. Once the police and the military are gone, you can replace it with this underground and begin this campaign of terror on the population until they concede to the will of nothing. The right of the individual is gone and all that is left is constant and perpetual conflict, a period of internecine warfare and strife.

Quite so; but yet it is more imposing on paper. Another had such a very dirty old uniform that there was an unpleasant odour in his proximity. Yet not one of these gentlemen showed the slightest self-consciousness—either about their clothes or their countenance or their character in any way. Neither of them ever imagined that they were looked at with repulsion; if they had imagined it they would not have minded--so long as their superiors did not look at them in that way. It is clear to me now that, owing to my unbounded vanity and to the high standard I set for myself, I often looked at myself with furious discontent, which verged on loathing, and so I inwardly attributed the same feeling to everyone. I hated my face, for instance: I thought it disgusting, and even suspected that there was something base in my expression, and so every day when I turned up at the office I tried to behave as independently as possible, and to assume a lofty expression, so that I might not be suspected of being abject. "My face may be ugly," I thought, "but let it be lofty, expressive, and, above all, EXTREMELY intelligent." But I was positively and painfully certain that it was impossible for my countenance ever to express those qualities. And what was worst of all, I thought it actually stupid looking, and I would have been quite satisfied if I could have looked intelligent. In fact, I would even have put up with looking base if, at the same time, my face could have been thought strikingly intelligent. - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky –

That is who this transformation ended up as because ultimately a transformation erupts as the inability of the individual to exist by individual talents and ability. Instead, the phantom and the boogieman from the underground will be hunting them down and seeking them with this spite, toothache, sickness, anger, and stink. Maybe some sectors of the living world enjoy opinions, bias, and lack of clarity, sloppy science, and faultless reasoning; however, Dostoevsky proves that it can also be entertaining and even powerful to fight fire with fire. It is a shame his and others must remain in the hole of despair they call the notes from their underground because if they come above ground and into the light, they might feel the heat of the sun and the ferocity of nature or the wrath of God. So much can be made of the underground slush of sewage movement which just makes every nation stink worse than it truly is. The sign does not say the United States of Immigrant sewage so let’s not get upset by these dirt stupid and worthless invaders.

An American engineer held hostage by Islamic militants in Afghanistan was freed in a daring nighttime raid by a Special Operations team last month, a rare move in a country where hostages often pay ransoms — or don't come home at all. A team of about 30 special operators composed mostly of Navy SEALs flew into the mountains outside Kabul on October 14 to retrieve the 61-year-old American businessman, killing his captors and returning him to safety after nearly two months in captivity, according to an account in the Army Times. "In my mind I'd given a military intervention a one out of a hundred chance," the unnamed engineer told the Army Times. The Taliban have kidnapped aid workers and journalists in recent years, and aggressive crime syndicates target wealthy Afghans and foreigners for ransom money. "These fellows wanted either blood or money, and they weren't getting it that way," the engineer said. The captive, who has lived and worked in Afghanistan for eight years, didn't have much to offer. "This guy didn't have any money at all. It was like a personal life mission for him to help others," said Bruce J. Huffman, a spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers in Afghanistan. …But when the kidnappers left him in one location for a stretch of days, the special ops group choppered in, climbing thousands of feet toward a mud hut where the engineer was being kept, while a select team approached and killed the militants before they could fire back. The engineer was helicoptered back to safety that night and checked out by doctors at the U.S. embassy. "I was in favor of that, 100 percent," he told the Army Times. "I was very surprised, very amazed and very happy." - Special Ops Rescue American Hostage in Nighttime Raid In Afghanistan, by Army Times and the Associated Press, November 11, 2008 -

This problem has not gone away and there are people in society who are willing to make the most obscure and preposterous claim in the most calm and insane spontaneity. They just feel that by capturing and imprisoning others, they can use you as a buoyancy device in an ocean they are drowning in while you beat them down and turn homicidal on them to get away and to escape some predator and sadistic stalker attacking. Some people will make them sink straight to the bottom. It is worse and even more detrimental when they are the police and use this deception to deflate your life and infatuate their life with the belittlement of others who are prisoners to their politics. The worst part is what to do afterwards. This is a creature and an animal who wishes to survive and declare themselves patriotic and citizens. They feel they have a right to lifetime employment and jobs which pay even more than rocket scientists. How this creature is able to skirt the law and survive or escape the death penalty is befuddling. It is very strange how this can occur in the open, in broad daylight, right on television, and is such a debilitating life experience.

You look into it, the object flies off into air, your reasons evaporate, the criminal is not to be found, the wrong becomes not a wrong but a phantom, something like the toothache, for which no one is to blame, and consequently there is only the same outlet left again--that is, to beat the wall as hard as you can. So you give it up with a wave of the hand because you have not found a fundamental cause. And try letting yourself be carried away by your feelings, blindly, without reflection, without a primary cause, repelling consciousness at least for a time; hate or love, if only not to sit with your hands folded. The day after tomorrow, at the latest, you will begin despising yourself for having knowingly deceived yourself. Result: a soap-bubble and inertia. Oh, gentlemen, do you know, perhaps I consider myself an intelligent man, only because all my life I have been able neither to begin nor to finish anything. Granted I am a babbler, a harmless vexatious babbler, like all of us. But what is to be done if the direct and sole vocation of every intelligent man is babble, that is, the intentional pouring of water through a sieve? - Notes from the Underground, by Fyodor Dostoevsky -

Do not be fooled by terms and symbols. This enemy has a major problem; they target and pick the most powerful and the best in society. They like to rob and mug those who have the most admirable and most valuable qualities. However, the biggest problem is how they hide and claim others are trapping them and making some dark side of them surface and become homicidal. They claim that by denying them and refusing their stalking and pursuit, a crime is committed on them and some captivity and secret trial is necessary to realign this obtuse obligation and re-education effort. This re-education effort is to confirm and conform to some large bodied, superior, dominating, and threatening left wing movement who does not feel the laws of the land apply to them and the right to exist as a human being should be the standard to judge them by yet they do not allow others the right to exist as an individual.

Ann, you are being accused of being a traitor to your own race and others. You are also being accused of being a traitor to your stalkers who feel you and they have a romance. I am not sure who you are a real traitor to or for, but I know that they created a situation where you and even I will be attacked 24 hours for the rest of our lives. My entire life is and was turned upside down by kidnappers and sadistic terrorists who felt it was a conspiracy by the right wing and how I was a traitor to their race. They emphasized race day and night as if it puts food on the table. As far as being a traitor to your own relationship, you have been honest with me and have told me everything except the details. You have some raging personal war and a massive attack on your private life and even marriage. Will you win a medal for valor, courage, or become another victim? You also said I was misjudging you so there may be more complexity and guilt involved. It is hard to judge others when a fierce battle is raging and your objective is to hurt them back. They just do whatever they want and try to justify it with something that upsets those who are in love with them. This is why your stalkers are upset with you and instead of attacking you; they come to me and attack me out of rage and anger. They never go to you directly and ask you. They feel impotent and restored by nearly destroying their own relationship which is driving them crazy because it is a serial killer fantasy or insanity itself. Even though you have told me everything, I still ask you if you feel dirty or if you are a traitor to your own love life; the object is to hurt them back and gain a medal for valor.

In the end and after all the smoke and mirrors of their effort, the final conclusion remains unshakeable, get rid of and dispose of this trash dump of human lawlessness and unspeakable effort to convert the nation into the crucible of hell for the devil himself. They hide, they try to make things surface by placing inordinate pressure on others, they are insane and no damn good at the same time, and worst of all, they just do not get it. They will never ever get it and that is the unshakeable reality which they will feel deeply in their empty soul when and if they surface and come out of hiding; yet we are their prisoners and we are the ones who are not pursuing them and want them gone. Their right to exist ends when they cannot live by that same standard and this problem grows bigger and bigger by the stupidity of the idiot who blows hot air in it. We do not know how to make them go away but we can certainly entertain them while they tell us honestly how to.











“Love Remains the Same” lyrics by Gavin Rossdale

A thousand times I've seen you standing
Gravity like lunar landing
You make me want to run till' I find you
I shut the world away from here
I drift to you, you're all I hear
As everything we know fades to black

(Bridge)
Half the time the world is ending
Truth is I am done pretending
(Chorus)
I never thought that I
Had anymore to give
You're pushing me so far
Here I am without you
Drink to all that we have lost
Mistakes we have made
Everything will change
But love remains the same

I find a place where we escape
Take you with me for the space
The city buzz sounds just like a fridge

I walk the streets through seven bars
I have to find just where you are
The faces seem to blur
They're all the same

(Bridge)

(Chorus)

So much more to say
So much to be done
Don't you trick me out
We shall overcome
It's all left still to play

We
Should’ve had the sun
Could have been inside
Instead we're over here

Half the time the world is ending
Truth is I am done pretending
Too much time too long defending
You and I are done pretending

(Chorus)

I, oh I,
I wish this could last forever
I, oh I,
As if we could last forever

Love remains the same
Love remains the same



“Smooth Criminal” lyrics by Alien Ant Farm

As he came into the window
Was a sound of a crescendo
He came into her apartment
He left the bloodstains on the carpet
She was sitting at the table
He could see she was unable
So she ran into the bedroom
She was struck down
It was her doom

(Chorus)
Annie, are you OK
Are you OK
Are you OK, Annie?
Annie, are you OK
You OK
Are you OK, Annie?
Annie, are you OK
You OK
You OK, Annie
Annie, are you OK
You OK
Are you OK, Annie?

Annie, are you OK
Will you tell us that you’re OK
There’s a sign at the window
That he struck you
A crescendo, Annie
He came into your apartment
He left the bloodstains on the carpet
Then you ran into the bedroom
You were struck down
It was your doom

(Chorus)

You’ve been hit by
You’ve been struck by
A smooth criminal

So they came into the out way
It was Sunday
What a black day
I could feel your salutation
Sounding heartbeats
Intimidations

(Chorus)

Annie, are you OK
Will you tell us that you’re OK?
There’s a sign at the window
That he struck you
A crescendo, Annie
He came into your apartment
He left the bloodstains on the carpet
Then you ran into the bedroom
You were struck down
It was your doom

Annie, are you OK
You OK
Are you OK, Annie?
You’ve been hit by
You’ve been struck by
A smooth criminal

Annie, are you OK
Will you tell us that you’re OK
There’s a sign at the window
That he struck you
A crescendo, Annie
He came into your apartment
He left the bloodstains on the carpet
Then you ran into the bedroom
You were struck down
It was your doom

(Chorus)




“Look What You’ve Done” lyrics by Jet

Take my photo off the wall
If it just won't sing for you
'Cause all that's left has gone away
And there's nothing there for you to prove

(Chorus)
Oooh look what you've done
You've made a fool of everyone
Ouch well, it seems likes such fun
Until you lose what…you… had… won

Give me back my point of view
'Cause I just can't think for you
I can hardly hear you say
What should I do, well you choose

(Chorus)

Oh, look what you've done
You've made a fool of everyone.
A fool of everyone
A fool of everyone

Take my photo off the wall
If it just won't sing… for you
'Cause all that's left has gone away
And there's nothing there for you… to do

(Chorus)

(Chorus)



“Civil War” lyrics by Guns N Roses

("What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach...
So, you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it!
Well, he gets it!
N' I don't like it any more than you men.")


Look at your young men fighting
Look at your women crying
Look at your young men dying
The way they've always done before

Look at the hate we're breeding
Look at the fear we're feeding
Look at the lives we're leading
The way we've always done before

(Chorus)
My hands are tied
The billions shift from side to side
And the wars go on with brainwashed pride
For the love of God and our human rights
And all these things are swept aside
By bloody hands time can't deny
And are washed away by your genocide
And history hides the lies of our civil wars


Do you wear a black armband?
When they shot the man
Who said "Peace could last forever"
And in my first memories
They shot Kennedy
I went numb when I learned to see
So I never fell for Vietnam
We got the wall of D.C. to remind us all
That you can't trust freedom
When it's not in your hands
When everybody's fightin'
For their promised land

And I don't need your civil war
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor
Your power hungry sellin' soldiers
In a human grocery store
Ain't that fresh?
I don't need your civil war

(Solo)

Look at the shoes your filling
Look at the blood we're spilling
Look at the world we're killing
The way we've always done before
Look in the doubt we've wallowed
Look at the leaders we've followed
Look at the lies we've swallowed
And I don't want to hear no more

(Chorus)

"We practice selective annihilation of mayors
And government officials
For example to create a vacuum
Then we fill that vacuum
As popular war advances
Peace is closer"

I don't need your civil war
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor
Your power hungry sellin' soldiers
In a human grocery store
Ain't that fresh
And I don't need your civil war
I don't need your civil war
I don't need your civil war
Your power hungry sellin' soldiers
In a human grocery store
Ain't that fresh
I don't need your civil war
I don't need one more war

I don't need one more war
Whaz so civil 'bout war anyway


“Crash into Me” lyrics by Dave Matthews Band

You've got your ball
You've got your chain
Tied to me tight, tie me up again
Who's got their claws?
In you my friend?
Into your heart I'll beat again
Sweet like candy to my soul
Sweet you rock
And sweet you roll
Lost for you, I'm so lost for you

(Chorus)
Oh, and you come crash into me
And I come into you
And I come into you
In a boy's dream
In a boy's dream

Touch your lips just so I know
In your eyes, love, it glows so
I'm bare-boned and crazy... for you

(Chorus)

And if I've gone overboard
Then I'm begging you
To forgive me
In my haste
When I'm holding you so girl
Close to me

Oh and you come crash into me, yeah
Baby, and I come into you
Hike up your skirt a little more
And show the world to me
Hike up your skirt a little more
And show your world to me
In a boy's dream
In a boy's dream

Oh, I watch you there
Through the window
And I stare at you
You wear nothing, but you
Wear it so well
Tied up and twisted
The way I'd like to be
For you, for me, come crash into me, baby
Come crash into me, yeah

Crash into me...
Crash into me...
Crash into me...

You know, I'm the king of the castle
You're the dirty rascal, crash into me
Please crash into me, baby...

Oh, no no no...
Yes, I see the waves
Come and crash into me
See the waves come and crash into me
Crash into me



“You Got Lucky” lyrics by Tom Petty

You better watch what you say
You better watch what you do to me
Don't get carried away
Girl, if you can do better than me, go
Yeah go but remember

Good love is hard to find
Good love is hard to find
You got lucky babe
Yeah, you got lucky babe
When I found you

You put a hand on my cheek
And then you turn your eyes away
If you don't feel complete
If I don't take you all of the way, go

Yeah go, but remember good love
Is hard to find
You got lucky babe
Yeah you got lucky
When I found you



“A Hand to Hold Onto” lyrics by John Cougar Mellencamp

You can laugh and joke and make fun of your friends
Spin in the middle when your troubles begin
Take it nice and easy and always pretend
That you're cool
so cool
so cool

Say, "I’m gunna hold onto that a while and I will and I’ll be tame"
Talk like a jerk on an educated brain
Be an old girl driving' the young boys insane
Be a joker, a preacher
It does not matter

(Chorus)
Everyone needs a hand to hold on to
Everyone needs a hand to hold on to
Don't need to be no strong hand
Don't need to be no rich hand
Everyone just needs a hand to hold on to

Having' good luck with your financial situation,
Play the ponies, be the president of the united nation,
Go to work and be a Hollywood stand,
Drive your 4 wheel drive right into the mud, but

(Chorus)

And in those hours when you're alone
And there's nobody there except yourself
I know it
You wanna pick up the phone
And say, "talk to me, talk to me, somebody please
Talk to me!" yeah!

(Chorus)

(Chorus)



“Hot N Cold” lyrics by Katy Perry

You change your mind
Like a girl changes clothes
Yeah you PMS
Like a bitch
I would know

And you over think
Always speak
Cryptically
I should know
That you're no good for me

(Chorus)
Cause you're hot then you're cold
You're yes then you're no
You're in then you're out
You're up then you're down
You're wrong when it's right
It's black and it's white
We fight we break up
We kiss we make up

You You don't really want to stay no
You But you don't really want to go-oh

You're hot then you're cold
You're yes then you're no
You're in and you're out
You're up and you're down

We used to be
Just like twins
So in sync
The same energy
Now's a dead battery
Used to laugh 'bout nothing
Now you’re plain boring
I should know that
You’re not gonna change

(Chorus)

You You don't really want to stay no
You But you don't really want to go-oh

You're hot then you're cold
You're yes then you're no
You're in and you're out
You're up and you're down

Someone call the doctor
Got a case of a love bi-polar
Stuck on a roller coaster
Can't get off this ride

You change your mind
Like a girl changes clothes

(Chorus)

(Chorus)

You You don't really want to stay no
You But you don't really want to go-oh

You're hot then you're cold
You're yes then you're no
You're in and you're out
You're up and you're down


“The Freshman” lyrics by The Verve Pipe

When I was young I knew everything
She’s a punk who rarely ever took advice
Now I'm guilt stricken
Sobbing with my head on the floor
Stop a baby's breath and a shoe full of rice

I can't be held responsible
She was touching her face
I won't be held responsible
She fell in love in the first place

(Chorus)
For the life of me I cannot remember
What made us think that we were wise and
We'd never compromise
For the life of me I cannot believe
We'd ever die for these sins
We were merely freshmen

My best friend took a week's
Vacation to forget her
His girl took a week’s worth of
Valium and slept
And now he's guilt stricken sobbing with his
Head on the floor
Thinks about her now and how he never really
Wept he says

I can't be held responsible
She was touching her face
I won't be held responsible
She fell in love in the first place

(Chorus)

Hey yeah
Hey yeah
Hey yeah

We've tried to wash our hands of all this
We never talk of our lacking relationships
And how we're guilt stricken sobbing with our
Heads on the floor
We fell through the ice when we tried not to
Slip, we'd say

I can't be held responsible
She was touching her face
And I won't be held responsible
She fell in love in the first place

(Chorus)

(Chorus)

We were merely freshmen



“Beautiful” lyrics by Flickerstick

You could be the devil in my bed
You could be the angel in my head
You could be the voices that I hear
I'm singing along because it sounds
Just like you're near

(Chorus)
'Cause you're so beautiful
Beautiful today
you’re so beautiful
Beautiful in every little way
Cause when you're coming around
I'm off of the ground
I've got to say
You’re so beautiful
You're beautiful today

I could be the drug you can't resist
I could be the antidote you missed
I could be the love you hate to fear
You're filling the hole inside your heart
With feeling near to me

(Chorus)
(Chorus)

Can we make it through
Together we've got to fly high
Don't you know I got to fly high
'Cause when you're coming around
I got to fly high
Don't you know
I want to fly

Cuz I know
Cuz I feel
That I could
Learn to hate just like you
Cuz I know
And I feel
That you could
Learn to love
Just like me
Just like you
Learn to love

(Chorus)
(Chorus)

Can we make it through?
Together
I got to fly